Mental Health Experts

1684 Words7 Pages
Crimes happen daily, and thousands of criminals are sent to court to defend themselves. Prosecutors often feel the need to bring in an expert witness to testify in cases where they feel an expert would better describe the situation. A mental health expert can be there to provide an objective analysis of the victim or even to describe the mental state of the suspect. These experts have to have certain criteria to be recognized as liable. Mental Health experts have contributed and are sometimes needed, and at times there are problems related with them. Since a mental health expert has to deal with many different cases, each speaker has different backgrounds with different cases. For example a forensic psychologist, can deal with police investigations, work in prisons, write risk assessments, counsel inmates and more. All mental health experts are different. For example a psychologist who works in jails would be studying forensic facts and dealing with psychopathy on a daily basis, unlike a psychologist who could be studying psychotherapy and dealing with children’s behaviours. Each is an expert in their own fields, it is up to the lawyers to decide which to use. Some psychologists can have developmental and social training but can be turned down to be an expert witness because they were missing clinical training. Clinical psychology would be the requirement that the expert would need in order to be considered. In the case of Mohan, he made a list of criteria that would be used for the choosing of the expert witness’s reliability. The expert had to have relevance to the topic, necessity to it, absence to the exclusionary rule and qualification of the expert. Hugo Munsterberg also played a role into bringing psychology into courts. He added demonstration of fallibility of memory, publishing on the witness stand and offered his own testimony as an expert witness in
Open Document