Media Issues In Social Media

1141 Words5 Pages
Social media platforms, such as Twitter, Facebook, and Instagram, enable its users to engage in political discussions regarding current events, due to the decentralization of traditional media. The shift from traditional and unilateral media, as for instance television and broad-casting services to interactive and modern media, enables the recipients to participate in con-temporary discussions. The powers which were traditionally occupied “by the media to shape and disseminate news about the world and the limitations of the individual foreign correspondent as a conduit to global events have now met the radically disseminated world of digital media” (Owen 118). Further, „Neue Medien [wie die oben genannten] bieten attraktive und praktische…show more content…
The by Limor Shifman addressed „jüngere[n] Bürger” (115) claim a large scope among social media users, as a study from 2014 found that “75 Percent of Millennials uses social media to discuss issues” (Anschuetz). Debates regarding race and race relations are especially prominent among black social media users, who are with 68 percent, roughly twice as likely as the 35 percent of whites, who claim “that at least some of the posts they see on social networking sites” concern racial issues, however, 67% of white social media users state that they neither post or share political statements regarding race (Anderson and Hitlin 2). Furthermore, only eleven percent (Anderson and Hitlin 8) of white participatory media users engage in regular controversies “about racial inequality or race relations” and, again, state that several of their social media posts concern race. Black users’ percentage is, nevertheless, with 30 percent higher (Anderson and Hitlin 8) and consequently resulting in a demographic and racial gap in America, regarding their interests online. Therefore, social media’s addressed racial gap is an indicator to which social group online activism is…show more content…
The American scholar and television personality Marc Lamont Hill defines “Nobodyness” (19) as those who are “abandoned by the State” (18), and “considered disposable” (19). In addition, “Nobodyness is largely indebted to race” (19) and “cannot be divorced from other forms of social injustice” (19). Therefore, participatory media can be used by the segregated and minorities, the so called “Nobody[s]” (18), in order to form a counter public for demands, as “Black women -cis and trans, […] with little access to institutional power have played […] [a] role in shaping recent national conversations about […] police brutality […] with the creation of hashtags like #BlackLivesMatter” (Jackson 377). Participatory media, therefore, can be considered a response to exclusionary mass media that features mainstream estimations and prohibits a dialog between opposing parties. This dialogue on interactive online platforms can facilitate this active, “polyvocal citizenship”, (Milner 2361) intending that the previously “marginalized will have a means to find information and engage in public conversation[s]on more equal footing” (Milner 2361). In addition, “millennial activists have rejected […] politics that guided much of the Civil Rights movement of the 1950s as the 1960s and have turned to new technologies as a tool
Open Document