Masking Poor Communication

570 Words3 Pages
Running head: WHAT IS EFFECTIVE COMMUNICATION Masking Poor Communication STUDENT NAME Ashford University Interpersonal Communication COM 200 PROFESSOR Due: ? Masking Poor Communication Human beings are first and foremost biological. Their biology brings forth languaging or “realities’ in which people think and act. Accepted as a truth, then would everyone agree that communication, effective communication, is of utmost importance? How about a philosophical approach: Birds fly, without the ability to fly, they will die. Fish swim, and without the ability to swim, they too will die. Humans communicate, and without the ability to communicate they will die. Whether with a spouse, or with a total stranger, we are a linguistic and social species who see ourselves as unique entities. When this is embodied such that we can act out of it, we can design to take care and anticipate breakdowns. In a January article of US News there was an experiment for comparing the communication skills of strangers and spouses against each other to see who was more effective (US News, 2011). The assumption is that the spouses understand each other more than perfect strangers. The breakdown with this experiment in my opinion is that the spouses could not visually observe each other when making statements; whereby misunderstandings between them were more frequent as a result. Our classroom text commonly identifies the communication type referenced in the US News piece as ‘dyadic communication’ (Sole, K. 2011). Dyadic Communication refers to two people who are connected in some way, such as family, friends, or spouses. The only exception here is that the experiment was absent of the non-verbal element of communication. I speculate that the percentages of poor communication would have declined with this element included. Miscommunication can occur in
Open Document