Marion Jones Case Study

555 Words3 Pages
In October 2007, Marion Jones, a sprinter for the United States summer Olympic team in the Sydney games in 2000, signed an ‘Acceptance of Sanction’ admitting to the use of performance enhancing drugs in front of the United States Anti-Doping Agency; forfeiting her rights to the medals and awards won at the Olympic games and disqualifying her from all track and field events in which she competed. On 10 April 2008, an appeal was filed by the International Olympic Committee (IOC) Executive Board against the United States women’s relay team of the 2000 Sydney Olympics in attempts to disqualify and force Jone’s teammates to also return all medals and awards presented to each sprinter who competed in the 4x100m and 4x400m relays. The athletes in question were Andrea Anderson, Latasha Colander Clark, Jearl Miles-Clark, Torri Edwars, Chryste Gaines, Monique Hennagan and Passion Richardson.…show more content…
Based on the Court of Arbitration for Sport (CAS) findings, the IOC and International Association of Athletics Federations (IAAF) did not present a clear ruling allowing the IOC to strip a team’s medals as a result of one team member’s wrongdoing during the 2000 Sydney Olympic Games. Therefore, on 16 July 2010, the appeal of the IOC Executive Board in 2008 was termed as incorrect and overruled based on the inexistent and unclear rules during the 2000 Sydney Olympic Games causing the allegation against the relay team to be unfair and inapplicable according to the CAS. The relay team was allowed to keep their medals and awards of the 2000 Olympic games in
Open Document