Managing Diversity for Success: the Case of Ibm

463 Words2 Pages
1. I have only experienced one radical policy change in my work experience. The policy change had to do with how employees utilized social media and the discussion materials and photos that were posted on these websites. Essentially, the policy intended to limit the content that related to work and/or could possibly bring discredit to the department or employee. Many employees questioned the policy as to whether or not the department could dictate what type of posts or photos were used during their personal time. However, this policy was important to stress that in the type of work that the department does it is relevant because this content may be used in court or in another arena to discredit the employee or the department. Once implemented, the policy did make employees to think twice prior to posting content that could be related to his/her work. I still believe that there are policies lacking on discrimination of transgender employees and respect among employees. Organizations stress the policies not tolerating discrimination for employees being part of a protected class without recognizing that the law does not protect transgender individuals from discrimination. Further, organizations focus so much on customer service this should also be stressed among the workforce. Employees need to respect each other in the workplace. 3. I do not feel that IBM neglected the majority of the workforce when they focused on making the workplace better for unrepresented groups. IBM created focus groups for men and women, LGTB, Asians, Hispanics, Native Americans, African-Americans and employees with disabilities. Regardless of race, any employee fits into either the men or women focus group. They created methods for employees to find mentors and to seek out ways to advance through those mentors. I think any company could follow IBM’s model or create a leadership
Open Document