Macbeth Vs. Machiavelli

613 Words3 Pages
When attempting to view “Macbeth’” through the eyes of Machiavelli, one can draw several conclusions based on Machiavelli’s “The Prince.” Four criticism, one good and three bad, are that Macbeth was willing to use cruelty to achieve power, he used cruelty poorly, he was changeable and irresolute, and he chose his advisers poorly. First, Machiavelli would admire Macbeth’s willingness to use cruelty as a means to achieve power. In Chapter VIII of “The Prince,” Machiavelli relates stories of Agathocles, who became King of Syracuse, and Oliverotto who became prince of the city of Fermo. While relating these stories, Machiavelli does not condemn the acts of cruelty these men perpetrated but simply tells them without judgment. From this, the reader can infer that Machiavelli has no negative opinion of the men, but is simply reciting the facts. Therefore, Machiavelli would have no problem with Macbeth’s willingness to use cruelty to use power. However, Machiavelli would have thought Macbeth used cruelty poorly. In chapter VIII of “The Prince,” Machiavelli states “Well used are those cruelties…that are carried out in a single stroke, done out of necessity to protect oneself, and are not continued.” He also states, “Badly used are those cruelties which….grow with the passing of time instead of disappearing.” Macbeth failed to come up with a plan to gather all his enemies in one place and execute and murder them quickly like Agathocles and Oliverotto, but ordered several murders of his adversaries over a prolonged period of time. Machiavelli would have admired Macbeth more had he been clever enough to have his enemies murdered all in “a single stroke.” Next, Machiavelli would have been critical of Macbeth’s indecisive nature. Macbeth was unsure whether to trust the predictions of the three witches. This resulted in erratic behavior on his part, such as when he raves

More about Macbeth Vs. Machiavelli

Open Document