Loftus and Palmer Study

449 Words2 Pages
Assignment 3 – Loftus and Palmer study replication Introduction Eye witness testimony is evidence which is provided by an individual that has witnessed a crime with a viewing to identifying the person that has committed the crime. Loftus and Palmer aimed to investigate the accuracy of memory after witnessing a car accident. They were aiming to see if leading questions change the accuracy of an eye witnesses' recall. Loftus and palmer focused on people estimating the speed of moving cars. Verb used | Mean speed estimated | smashed | 40.8 | collided | 39.3 | bumped | 38.1 | hit | 34.0 | contacted | 31.8 | The table shows that the more violent the verb sounds then the more the mean speed is estimated, such as contacted is not a very violent verb and only has an estimate of 31.8 whereas the most violent verb which is smashed has a high estimate of the mean speed. A leading question is something which suggests what the right answer is. If someone was asked the question with ‘smashed’ in it, they may think that they are supposed to give a higher estimate than if someone is given the question with ‘contacted’ in it. The aim of this study is to investigate the effects of different types of verbs used to influence a person’s recall. This will be a replication of the study that Loftus and Palmer carried out. My research hypothesis is that the way in which the verb is worded will affect the person’s estimate of speed. My null hypothesis is that the way in which the verb is worded will not affect the person’s estimate of speed. Method I am going to conduct a laboratory experiment. The independent variable is the variable that you change, which in this case is the verb. The dependent variable is the variable that you keep the same which is the mean speed estimated. The ethical issue that is involved is deception. As an experimenter I will deal with

More about Loftus and Palmer Study

Open Document