Lindsey Bustos Ms. Paulson CO-150: College Composition 2/13/13 “Privacy Strikes Back” Summary: In Jeffery Rosen’s article, “Privacy Strikes Back” published on November 11, 2010 in The New Republic he talks about recent issues of one’s privacy invasion online and the legal troubles surrounding it. The author’s thesis is that when someone’s sexual surveillance privacy is invaded they should have the right to sue but without interfering with anyone’s freedom of speech. Rosen states in his article that, “…as evidence that personal surveillance technologies have spun so far out of control that nothing can reign them in.” Rosen provides many examples of cases that have happened recently that have ended scandalously and tragically.
CIS 502 Case Study 2 Social Engineering Attacks and Counterintelligence Purchase here http://homeworkonestop.com/CIS%20502/cis-502-case-study-2-social-engineering-attacks-and-counterintelligence Product Description Case Study 2: Social Engineering Attacks and Counterintelligence Social engineering attacks and counterintelligence have major impacts to our national security. In July 2010, the Afghan War Diary was released in WikiLeaks. In October 2010, WikiLeaks also released the largest military leak in history – the Iraq War Logs revealing the war occupation in Iraq. This type of information is considered as classified data by the Department of Defense. Read the article titled, “WikiLeaks Releases 400,000 Classified US Military Files”, and then read the article titled, “WikiLeaks: At Least 109,000 Killed During Iraq War”.
CIS 502 Case Study 2 Social Engineering Attacks and Counterintelligence Purchase here http://homeworkonestop.com/CIS%20502/cis-502-case-study-2-social-engineering-attacks-and-counterintelligence Product Description Case Study 2: Social Engineering Attacks and Counterintelligence Social engineering attacks and counterintelligence have major impacts to our national security. In July 2010, the Afghan War Diary was released in WikiLeaks. In October 2010, WikiLeaks also released the largest military leak in history – the Iraq War Logs revealing the war occupation in Iraq. This type of information is considered as classified data by the Department of Defense. Read the article titled, “WikiLeaks Releases 400,000 Classified US Military Files”, and then read the article titled, “WikiLeaks: At Least 109,000 Killed During Iraq War”.
CIS 502 Case Study 2 Social Engineering Attacks and Counterintelligence Purchase here http://homeworkonestop.com/CIS%20502/cis-502-case-study-2-social-engineering-attacks-and-counterintelligence Product Description Case Study 2: Social Engineering Attacks and Counterintelligence Social engineering attacks and counterintelligence have major impacts to our national security. In July 2010, the Afghan War Diary was released in WikiLeaks. In October 2010, WikiLeaks also released the largest military leak in history – the Iraq War Logs revealing the war occupation in Iraq. This type of information is considered as classified data by the Department of Defense. Read the article titled, “WikiLeaks Releases 400,000 Classified US Military Files”, and then read the article titled, “WikiLeaks: At Least 109,000 Killed During Iraq War”.
CIS 502 Case Study 2 Social Engineering Attacks and Counterintelligence Purchase here http://homeworkonestop.com/CIS%20502/cis-502-case-study-2-social-engineering-attacks-and-counterintelligence Product Description Case Study 2: Social Engineering Attacks and Counterintelligence Social engineering attacks and counterintelligence have major impacts to our national security. In July 2010, the Afghan War Diary was released in WikiLeaks. In October 2010, WikiLeaks also released the largest military leak in history – the Iraq War Logs revealing the war occupation in Iraq. This type of information is considered as classified data by the Department of Defense. Read the article titled, “WikiLeaks Releases 400,000 Classified US Military Files”, and then read the article titled, “WikiLeaks: At Least 109,000 Killed During Iraq War”.
“Analyzing the Text” Michael Levin’s, “The Case for Torture” argues that there are various reasons for allowing torture in the United States of America. Michael Levin believes that torture is justified when victims are at risk, claiming that torture is not merely permissible but morally mandatory. The author makes hypothetical scenarios in which people’s lives are in danger and preventing future events from occurring. Then stating his position on torture when people’s lives are placed in danger. Levin’s target audience is Americans because his use of American symbolism such as “July 4,” and “unconstitutional.” In addition, the United States is not the only victim of terrorist attacks.
The Patriot Act authorizes unethical and unconstitutional surveillance of American citizens with a negligible improvement in national security. Free speech, free thinking, and a free American lifestyle cannot survive in the climate of distrust and constant fear created by the Patriot Act. The words that Bush once said about protecting civil liberties have been forgotten. Undoubtedly, The Patriot Act takes away individual privacy rights and liberties from American citizens in exchange for the “greater good” of the country. The first reason of how the Patriot Act negatively affects our society is by taking away freedom of speech and the right to express and communicate ideas.
Analysis On Bilingual Ballots George Wills’ “Bilingual Ballots Mock Our System” first appeared in a news article from The Washington Post. In this essay, Wills’ aims to state his opinion as to why bilingual ballots should be prohibited and done away with. He intends to persuade the reader that the United States rules of law and that our countries national identity is becoming “attenuated” by illegal immigration. That these bilingual ballots are bypassing our federal laws and in a way, these ballots are influencing illegal immigration. Wills’ claims that the federal government's chief law enforcement official might need a refresher course on federal law pertaining to legal immigrants.
RUNNING HEAD: THE PATRIOT ACT V CIVIL LIBERTIES The Patriot Act V. Civil Liberties Demetra Ohlen Saint Leo University Legal Issues in Criminal Justice Administration II CRM 551 Professor Jordan November 14, 2008 Abstract Since its inception, The Patriot Act has engendered a tremendous of controversy. Adversaries of the Act have maintained that it was approved opportunistically after the September 11 terrorist assault, believing there to have been little debate. They view the Act as one that was hurried through the Senate with little change before it was passed. The Act increases the ability of law enforcement agencies to search telephone, e-mail communications, medical, financial and other records The Act increases the ability of law enforcement agencies to search telephone, e-mail communications, medical, financial and other records; eases restrictions on foreign intelligence gathering within the United States; expands the Secretary of the Treasury’s authority to regulate financial transactions, particularly those involving foreign individuals and entities; and enhances the discretion of law enforcement and immigration authorities in detaining and deporting immigrants suspected of terrorism-related acts. The act also expands the definition of terrorism to include domestic terrorism, thus enlarging the number of activities to which the USA Patriot Act’s expanded law enforcement powers can be applied.
Habeas corpus is considered the “great writ of liberty” in both the English and American constitutional values. The writ allows individuals to challenge imprisonment as unlawful. There are many issues surrounding terrorism, civil liberties, and presidential power in regards to the ongoing debate about habeas corpus and the war on terror. Although civil rights should be protected and detainees should be dealt with on an individual basis by the Supreme Court, the President of the United States should have full authority to suspend the right of habeas corpus to those who are suspected of terrorism, especially during times that are declared as a “national emergency.” Derived from English common law, habeas corpus first appeared in the Magna Carta of 1215 and is considered the oldest human right in the history of English-speaking civilization. The doctrine of habeas corpus stems from the requirement that a government can either charge a person or must let him go free (Rutherford, 2013).