Literary Analysis for the Necklace

1226 Words5 Pages
Literary Analysis for The Necklace by Guy De Maupassant. Guy De Maupassant’s short story, The Necklace, is based on the life of a woman and her husband living in France in the 1800’s. From Maupassant’s work one is able to conclude that the woman, Mathlide, is an unsatisfied and materialistic person. Whilst her husband, Monsieur Loisel, may blatantly be seen as her opposite, who is content and seems to enjoy the simpler things in life. Like this title, the story revolves around a necklace that was borrowed, lost, re-bought and with several years of suffering, ultimately paid back. In an era, where wealth and social class were of importance and there was an absence of the social ladder we have today, many may seek to be understanding towards Mathlide’s views, however, others may clearly see not only how Mathlide’s ungratefulness is brought out in character revelation and plot but also how her life has evolved through symbolism. The protagonist, Mathilde Loisel dreams of being an elite, her life consists of simple clothes and a plain household filled with functional things. She has a single servant and her husband holds a steady job. Their lifestyle is better than those held by much of the population where they reside, but Mathilde is unhappy with her lot in life. She is portrayed as someone who believes she deserves a better life than the one she has. She wants to “please, to be envied, to be charming, to be sought after”. Mathilde’s idea of a wealthy lifestyle is glamourized, she spends her days dreaming of a home filled with expensive luxuries, closets of fine dresses and jewels, servants, and rich banquets. Mathilde simply fails to appreciate the good lifestyle she shares with her husband. She wishes for the day she’d be able to escape from it all and gets a chance to do so at this important ball, a night which she uses 10 years to pay for.
Open Document