If you were using the cognitive approach you would only get qualitative data which could be a problem as not everyone interprets the same answer in the same way. This would be more objective. This would also mean it is not valid as you are measuring why you think
When starting with others say you should except that other may not care for what you say causing controversy. It doesn’t always have to start out with a disagreement, but using other resources to start out a paper is always useful because later in the text the reader gets to see if you dis/agree with what others say. Once you have used what others have said be sure to continue it later through out the text. It reminds the reader what you are talking about and it allows you to keep track of not getting off the main subject. If you start jumping around in the text the reader won’t be able to follow along.
Yet I believe that this book, “The Chocolate War” by Robert Cormier, should be kept in schools to be read by teenagers. Many people believe that this book should be banned for the fact that it talks about bullying and violence. In a couple parts of the story, Jerry is beaten up. There are also multiple parts where the Vigils or Janza bully a kid. But that isn’t so bad that we should ban it.
Also, it will make students wonder how people could actually believe these things. However, in the book Fahrenheit 451, there are points that will make students question why they should bother learning. In the novel, Fahrenheit 451, there are points in the book where students will obtain the point of view from where they can see how controversial reading can be. They get this point of view from the following quote, “‘Where’s your common sense, none of these books agree with each other…Snap out of it’” (38)! This quote can give readers the thought that rather than books being beneficial to the
Even though it is just Wiesel’s duty to write it down, the literacy may change people’s mind. Both authors talk about what literacy is capable of and it may change people’s
Williams has read The Adventures of Huckleberry Finn, and where Julius Lester does not understand the novel, Williams does. He begins bye recapping the book’s long, history of censorship. “The earliest censors… believed the novel would corrupt the young” (Williams 98). In the story, Huck would spit and do rude things that were believed to be unsuitable for young readers at the time. These opinions have, however, changed.
Your personal reaction to the book is a small part of this assignment. • Style. Papers turned in for a grade should be proofread for grammar, punctuation, spelling, etc. While the purpose of this assignment is not to bust you for minor errors, consistent issues with style will distract readers from the points you are trying to make. Read your paper after you print it out.
Teens are mature enough to read profanity and not make childish comments regarding them. When comparing the amount of profanity in the book to other contents it isn’t even half as bad. He even tries to erase the profanity. He said “it drove me crazy…I thought Phoebe and all the other little kids will see it…I rubbed it out …” (260-261). He tries to preserve the viridity of the children by erasing the profanity showing what kind of person he really is.
It is a textbook source as well. To say this, then one would hope that it can be trusted. Since, it was from a person’s memory then I would second guess on some of the information. It is troublesome to remember things, especially as one gets
Some of there reasons were because it is inspiring, because it helped be decided that I wanted to work with child protective services. A lot of people think that it should be banned because of all the profanity and violence and they don’t think that kids should be reading cuss words and learning about all this violence because it could affect them. Some people also think that an English is educated enough to explain the book to the students. I understand where people are coming from when they say they think that this book should