They all played a big role in how Lloyd George became the Prime Minister without a party and the conservatives where the party in coalition with him. The first reason why Lloyd George and the conservatives won the elections is because of Lloyd George himself. One of the main reasons for this was because he was a great public speaker and socially impressed people. This was important because he had to get the public onside to get the vote. He did this by telling the people that land fit for heroes would come out of the war.
Many of the Conservatives at the time realised that it was inevitable due to popular agitation and past attempts to pass similar acts that the act would be passed and thus knew that it did not involve an abundance of political skill other than that of oratorial talent to pass this electoral reform through the commons. Thus this can clearly not be the only reason why the Conservatives saw Disraeli as the next leader. His political skill and determination was one of these reasons and played a considerable part in his rise to party leader. He was a very intelligent man and clearly was at ease with the English language, his
Do you agree with the view that, as far as strategy and tactics were concerned, Haig and his generals were ‘pretty good’? Use sources 6 and 7 and your own knowledge. Sir Douglas Haig was regarded as one of the most significant generals during the First World War. He faced a number of problems that were difficult to overcome, but his strategies and tactics helped him to get through them, and soon enough he created the most sophisticated and massive artillery corps that was to crack the German lines. Despite Haig’s successes, he had a fair bit of opposition against him.
I believe he can be the leader this nation needs right now. With the stress our candidates go through just during election time it’s a miracle they accomplish anything in office. I truly feel privileged in being able to select the leader for this nation. I know that Josh will live up to not only my expectations, but also to the expectations of The United States of America. It is time for radical change in this country.
Stolypin was the cheif minister at this time and a huge supporter of autocracy so by his influence - due to his high power, was able to help strengthen the regime, as he was such a strong supporter of it. He was a very strong character and seemed to be the leader Russia needed at the time, being under the control of a weak and confused leader, Nicholas II, the hard line, strict, knowledgeable Stolypin was a welcome sight in rebuilding the crumbling foundations of Russia. He was suited to the job, and had a vision of how to move Russia forward, but without losing the autocratic power of the Tsar as he so strongly supported this, however he was not particularly popular due to his hard line tactics. He dominated the government until he was assassinated in 1911. One of Stolypins main priorities was to get rid of opposition he has stated ‘repression first and then and only then reform’ so we know he felt in order to be able to move Russia forward, opposition needed to be out ruled.
The biggest issue facing these men at all times was the security and future of the United States, and these men are very important contributors to our country because they were able to set up a stable foundation for our country on which we still depend on today. One common theme throughout all of the chapters in this novel was conflicts. Some were internal, while most were external. These conflicts often involved the Founding Brothers and they were often over political disagreements. Although they all had one common goal, to solidify the United States as an independent, democratic country, they all had different ideas on how to approach this.
The advice George Washington gave to the American Public as well as its political leaders was inspiring and heroic, however the advice he had given was taken seriously but varied amongst the American people and its political officials. Washington briefly described he didn’t expect every word he wrote in his farewell to have a great impact on how American politics were ran or an impression on the American people but to learn from and understand his decisions during his presidency. The three principles he followed during his argument to keep the new nations government successful and thriving were sectional antagonisms, baneful effects of the spirit of party, and lastly avoidance of creating permanent alliances but creating temporary alliances for dangerous emergencies. Although the American people now had say so in how the government was ran and it’s decisions, it was up to the politicians how the advice George Washington gave would be taken seriously and carried out. Washington brought his concerns to the American people by trying to persuade them that their independence, safety, and liberty were all to be determined by the unity of their states.
There are many similar themes found when comparing the two books by Heckscher and Cooper. Heckscher wrote a persuasive biography arguing how strong and overall successful Woodrow Wilson was as our national leader. By devoting his life to studying the matter, Heckscher’s opinion was significantly respected by a great number of people. Heckscher strived to show that the strengths of Wilson combined with his strong, determined personality allowed his to be a great leader up until his sickness “destroyed” everything that he had worked hard to achieve. Cooper on the other hand used Wilson’s weaknesses to criticize him.
George Washington: Our Leader A look into the life and leadership lessons of one of our most famous leader George Washington: Our Leader There are various theories on leadership styles, McConnell (2006) states that the three basic leadership styles are laissez-faire, participative (democratic), and authoritarian. George Washington was selected Commander in Chief of the Continental Army because of his courage and bravery, his ability to motivate and command respect from his followers, and his strategic ability in battle. His reputation as a daring and successful leader inspired confidence and loyalty in his followers. If it weren't for George Washington, it would be a different America today. “Traditional methods and styles of
Segment 1 Writing Assignment Many factors contribute to a successful president. As president of the United States of America you have to maintain a certain image that a majority of Americans will perceive as a strong leader while remaining compassionate about issues affecting the entire Nation. Americans tend to rate presidents on their accomplishments during office and the stability of the economy during the president’s term [ (C-Span, 2009) ]. I strongly believe that timing plays an enormous factor in a president’s overall rating as well. “Great presidents are made not just by themselves and their upbringing, but also made by their times in which they live” [ (Rove, 2003) ].