Industrial Revolution Essay Topic : To what extent did the Industrial Revolution bring about positive change. By : Max Chung The Industrial Revolution of the 19th century made an overall positive impact on Western society. Introduction of factories, the assembly line, new inventions, the development of electricity, and the railroads all contributed to quicker and efficient production of goods and materials. However, it had a negative impact on the people as well. As factories were invented, there were much more pollution compared to the past which brought many health problems to the people.
Due to industrialisation, factories were built which lead to rapid growth of population in the towns and cities for example from 98 million in 1885 to 125 million in 1905. However though this meant that the economy was improving, the growth in population led to poor living and working conditions which increased social unrest. As trade unions had been made illegal there was no way to protest which lead to support for more radical
She wrote a book about her experience called "Notes on Nursing" which became very popular in America. (3) Physicians and prominent members of volunteer relief groups in United States noted the success of the British Sanitary Commission and Florence Nightingale. Elizabeth Blackwell, the first female physician in America saw the war "as a challenge to practitioners on medicine, sanitation and
Did Life Improve During the Industrial Revolution The Industrial Revolution was a series of changes in the 18th and 19th century that affected the way that most people lived in Britain. Some of these changes could be seen as positive, such as the building of a railway network which improved transport significantly, but some of these changes could be seen as negative, such as the building of factories which increased the amount of pollution in large cities. There were many medical advances during the Industrial Revolution. For example, in 1796, Edward Jenner developed the first vaccine for smallpox. This was significant because smallpox had a mortality rate of up to 35% so this vaccination would have saved a lot of lives and it would have made life considerably better for those who could afford to be vaccinated.
Thesis Statement: Many diseases were transferred from the old world to the new world and so on. Europeans were more exposed to these illnesses but also had cures created over the years. Indians had never been around such illnesses and were much more susceptible to it. Write Your Essay There were many severe and deadly consequences of the Columbian Exchange. Death was rampant at this time.
Through public measures, the government tried to introduce public sanitation measures, like the Romans had when miasmas were thought to create illness and disease. A Miasma is merely a bad smell, however, the main focus was purely on public cleansing, which helped a great deal in reducing those who fell ill. In more depth, Florence nightingale was one of the people who publicised the miasma theory of disease, and campaigned for cleaner hospitals. This meant that hygiene in hospitals was greatly improved, and the possibility of contracting a disease was reduced. The benefits of these measures and many more were clear, as to the end of the nineteenth century; councils in England were competing with each other to provide the best public health care.
He said this as he thought that better nutrition increased the resistance against infections and helped our immune systems to fight them. Although this seems logical, critics say that he doesn’t explain why females, who receive a smaller share of food, lived longer than males. Also how it doesn’t explain why infectious diseases such as measles rose. In the 1950’s improved medical knowledge, techniques and organisations helped to reduce the amounts of deaths. This was due to advances in not just the medical practice but the actual medicine used, for example there were advances in antibiotics.
These all, in turn called the government to tackle public health problems in the 19th century. The big stink had the biggest impact in changing the government’s attitudes towards public health problems. Before the ‘big stink’ the houses of parliament were unaffected by the smell of London and so were the rich, thinking it would stay that way they took no action. This is such an important factor because the ‘big stink’ actually reached the rich and houses of parliament, this caused them to realise how serious the problem was. This aspect alone helped the problem get to the noses of people who had power, so they themselves could make a change.
Fisher drew her audience’s attention by pointing out herself as a living sample of HIV positive. Like a lot of the audience in that room, she came from a wealthy family, and she was mother of two children. Fisher used rhetorical appeals of ethos, pathos, and logos in the speech to persuade her audience in the situation. Even before Fisher spoke, just who she was brought her a huge amount of credibility. The Republican Party brought her up on the stage on purpose, because Mary Fisher was a perfect example of a “safe” person to speak about AIDS.
Much of this investment came from already industrialized countries like Germany, Great Britain, and France whose business owners looked for new investment opportunities in the United States. These investors put money into the work of mechanics and engineers with the expertise to develop new, more efficient ways of mass-producing goods. Machines benefited the United States by allowing business owners to specialize in the production of goods and manufacture them in large quantities to distribute throughout the nation or export. As a result, the cost of mass-produced goods went down as their quantity went up causing industrial profits to rise. With the creation of transcontinental railroads and telephones, marketing nationally was available to distribute these goods.