Kaiser Case Study

645 Words3 Pages
DBA 7632 Unit 3 – Case Study Kaiser Aluminum Student: Arturo Canales DBA 7632 October 06, 2014 Kaiser Aluminum Case Study 1. Are the percentage figures in the case “quotas”? Are they justified under the circumstances? According to the Webster’s dictionary a quota is “a specific amount or number that is expected to be achieved” (Houghton Mifflin Company, 1988). Therefore, I would say that a goal to accomplish a 40% skilled black laborer level is considered a quota. These quotas are justified in light of the “overwhelming racial equality in the Kaiser workforce” (U.S. Supreme Court, 1979) and the immediate need to rectify this moral injustice. 2. Does Kaiser have a justified employment policy? If not, how should it be revised? Kaiser did not have a justified employment policy at the time (1974) that this incident took place. Since then they have updated their policies and their website states in their Code of Conduct that “diversity of our employees is a tremendous asset” and we “do not tolerate discrimination or harassment of any kind” (Kaiser Aluminum, 2014). It appears that Kaiser Aluminum is attempting to correct the sins of their past and that they have revised their employment policy. However, I conducted some more research on a career website and found that Kaiser employee’s average rating on their company was only a 3.7 out of 10 points. This rating applied to “Company Culture, Support You Get, Work Setting, Growth Opportunities, and People You Work With” (CareerBliss, 2014) categories. This rating and many, many negative employee comments on this website from over 10 locations nationwide is not a good indicator that things have changed although company policy has changed. My impression is that a major change is needed in order to implement a Culture Climate change at Kaiser. 3. Does Kaiser’s policy eventuate in reverse discrimination

More about Kaiser Case Study

Open Document