“Johnny Byron and Willy Loman Are Tragic Figures” Far Do You Agree That This Statement Fits Death of a Salesman More That Jerusalem?

293 Words2 Pages
“Johnny Byron and Willy Loman are tragic figures” far do you agree that this statement fits Death of a salesman more that Jerusalem? Both miller and Butterworth use the characters, Willy and Johnny to portray the theme of a tragic figure. Struck by the misfortune of fate Willy Loman and Johnny Byron are trapped in their altered perception of reality which they have created using elaborate lies to mask their ordinary state, imprinting them both with the scar of a tragic flaw in which one character finds so hard to remove, it later becomes his downfall. What seems to be the most tormenting part of both plays is the characters indecision. Comparably each fictional character struggles to maintain their sanity, often reacting in rash and condescending behaviour. One factor making Willy and Johnny both tragic figures are their issues with reality vs. fantasy, in the opening act Miller describes the surroundings as “a solid vault of apartment houses around a small fragile-seeming home… A dream rising out of reality” suggesting the characters state of mind. Willy’s fantasy is that he is living the American dream or at lease close to it, however the reality is that he is having a breakdown and not as famously known as he portrays. Miller expresses this right from the start, allowing the character of Willy Loman to contradict himself and react irrationally towards the people closest to him. According to Aristotle’s hypothesis of a tragic hero the character must be of some form of nobility, suffer from some form of error in judgment, go through a period of reversed fortune, and finally recognize that the error was actually caused by his own actions. The concept of tragedy is deeply embedded into both plays however

More about “Johnny Byron and Willy Loman Are Tragic Figures” Far Do You Agree That This Statement Fits Death of a Salesman More That Jerusalem?

Open Document