John Was Concerned to Present the Signs as Historical

509 Words3 Pages
John was concerned to present the signs as historical events, to what extent do you agree? John’s gospel is full of symbolism and spiritual meanings, this may have been his own interpretation but it was based on the history of Jesus and his ministry. If John’s gospel did not have some historical accuracy then the early church would not have accepted it. Many of his signs such as the feeding of the 5000 or the healing of the crippled man can also be found in the synoptic gospels making it highly likely that these events actually took place and were quite popular. However, theologians are aware of the possible adaptions and redactions made by the early church and gospel writers, which makes it possible for John to have elaborated certain stories to help strengthen them. For example the crippled man may not have been crippled for 38 years it could have been more or less, just as there may have been a wedding but just not in Cana. John fabricated certain details to give more substance to the stories. Advances in archaeology uncovered evidence that John’s signs are historical, there is a lack of evidence for the healing of the crippled man, many claimed that John had invented the detail of the five porticoes at the healing of the cripples man to represent the five books of Moses, which Jesus had come to fulfil. However, archaeologists found 2 large water reservoirs in Bethesda surrounded by four colonnaded porticos around the sides and one in the centre. This discovery proved the occurrence mentioned in John’s account. Archaeologists have also found several stone jars in the ruined houses in Jerusalem. At least six of them stood in the basement kitchen of the Burnt house. They are a similar weight and size to the jars that would have been used at the wedding of Cana. This is proof that this event did in fact occur and is historical. John’s has carefully
Open Document