Japan Bombing Just and Unjust

1019 Words5 Pages
+Basic Critical Thinking Individual Work Week 3: Teamwork Questions for Analysis 1. Describe the main arguments, reasons, and evidence that support the perspective of Historian A. Answer-the main arguments in Historian A the atomic bombing on Japan was an unjustified way to end the war. It is argued by the United States that by them dropping the bombs upon Japan that they not only shortened the war but saved many of lives in the process. While others like a few historians these are people who keep documentation on important events throughout the world’s history. They argue that that in no way that the United States was in the right to drop the atomic bombs onto Japan for any reason at all. There were even a few American top military leaders wasn’t cool with using the bombs because they knew that it was of little effect on the war seeing as Japan was trying to surrender. The reason that American political leaders give for the use of the bombs that they had to demonstrate the power that they held by destroying a city. See the whole reason behind dropping the bombs in the first place was to scare Russia from getting involved in the war with Japan and that by showing them the kind of power that they had that they believed that they could get Russians to agree upon their terms in both Europe and Asia. They said that it was to be their master card. Another reason for unleashing the bombs on Japan was that they wanted to end the war going on in Asia before Russia had the chance to get involved in the war even though Japan discussing surrender, however the United States wasn’t hearing it, because they wanted Japan to surrender to them in days and not weeks. See the feared that by the Russians getting involved in the war that they could spread communism to China as well as other countries maybe even to Japan itself and they didn’t want that to happen so they thought
Open Document