Jacques Cartier The Rdquo Analysis

1429 Words6 Pages
Historian Alan Gordon begins an informative essay on Jacques Cartier, the “Discoverer of Canada,” with the intriguing statement that this sixteenth century French explorer was “really a nineteenth-century figure”[1]. The author then proceeds to explain this extraordinary statement by describing how Cartier was virtually unknown to Canadians prior to the nineteenth century, which is when Cartier himself was “discovered,” so to speak, by the historians of that era. After a rather exhaustive introduction, Gordon states his premise quite deep in to the essay, which is that he “...will attempt to show how historical heroes are used for political ends”[2]. This is an evocative approach, which Gordon…show more content…
In doing so, Gordon draws upon the philosophy of Immanuel Kant, as well as the idea of Bill Butler and Thomas Carlyle, who all made insightful comments on the role that historical heroes play in how a national populace conceptualizes its identity as a specific people with a shared communal past. As Gordon states, “The hero is a figure that supports the shared hopes, dreams, meanings, and especially memories of a society”[4]. This argument flows logically into a more detailed discussion of French-Canadian nationalism, the ideas that it encompasses and Cartier’s role in this paradigm. In doing so, Gordon delineates how Cartier came to be perceived within the context of nineteenth century Canadian politics and by both sides of that political spectrum, conservative and liberal, making it clear that, at first, he was perceived as justifying the…show more content…
Although his introduction is extensive and makes it difficult to pinpoint his thesis, Gordon’s argument proves it quite well by showing that this historical figure was reinterpreted as a symbol to fit the political needs of the country and specific groups in specific ways. At times, Gordon gets so bogged down in detail that the reader might be tempted to think that he has lost sight of his objective, getting lost in the “trees” so badly that he no longer can conceptualize the “forest,” but he always manages to emerge from these detailed discussions of Canadian history to clarify the issues that pertain to his thesis. The manner in which the article is written appears to uplift Cartier and hold him as a heroic icon for generations to witness, whereas the book illustrates Cartier’s historical significance to specific events by providing factual details in a neutral position. As this suggests, Gordon is a little dry in places and a trifle confusing, but ultimately he proves his points and offers valuable insight on the role of historical heroes within the framework of an era’s contemporary
Open Document