In Defense of Marcus Caelius

2201 Words9 Pages
Brendan Hyland History 677 Professor McMahon 10/08/13 Cicero’s, In Defense of Marcus Caelius, can be distinguished from his and other judicial speeches of the era due to its overtly theatrical style and rhetoric. Cicero effectively employs a number of dramatic techniques to serve his purpose to acquire his audience’s ‘attenti’ and ‘benivoli’. As R. G. Austin notes in his text titled, Cicero:Pro M. Caelio Oratio, ‘the three traditional functions of the orator were docere, delectare, movere, described as ‘to teach, to delight, and to move.’ Docere, translated as to instruct, teach, or point out, was first introduced in Cicero’s book, De Oratore. Cicero completed this text in 55 BC as a dialogue to ‘describe the ideal speaker and imagine him as a moral guidance of the state.’ Cicero breaks down the term Docere further and summarizes that 'to teach' means to ‘provide truth through rational argument and statement of facts.’ Delectare translates to "delight" and Cicero believed that this form of rhetoric exists solely to pleasure the listener. Cicero uses delectare as a form of speech that appeals to someone’s ethos, or character, for no other reason than to amuse the audience. Cicero’s use of comedy or humor holds two purposes. First, he seeks to loosen the tension among jurors and members of the court and secondly, to attempt to dull the charges brought against his client, Marcus Caelius. Cicero’s speech is especially concerned with the third style of rhetoric, or the ‘grand style’. Notably, Cicero’s ability to characterize his client, the prosecution and himself differentiates the, Pro Caelio from other lectures and marks his ability as one of Rome’s finest orators. This essay will examine how Cicero’s unique and veraciously dramatic style was beneficial to the outcome in his defense of Caelius. An orator should possess many skills, including sufficient
Open Document