Illinois Super Conductor

980 Words4 Pages
Assignment 1 1 Assess ISC’s market entry strategy. Do you agree with their targeting decisions? Why or why not? We agree with ISC’s decision to pursue the analog aftermarket segment for two main reasons: 1. It provided the largest existing opportunity and 2. ISC felt that the aftermarket use of ISC’s technology would translate back to OEM’s purchasing decision and that they would follow suit with their customers. Despite having a strong relationship with OEM’s such as AT&T, we feel that ISC would inevitably have less power in the OEM partnership. ATT sales force’s interests were not aligned with ISC’s sales goals. This misalignment was due to the fact that the technology would reduce the need for more base stations and ATT sales people were paid on the number of base stations sold. ISC would be powerless to motivate the sales force. Factors that favored the aftermarket decision include the fact that in the long term, these customers would be the ultimate adopters of the technology. In turn, these customers could demand that OEM install ISC’s products. While ISC would need to train and use their sales force and provide servicing, they would at least have control over the customer interaction from beginning to end. Specific targeting between analog, digital and PCS technologies was also difficult given that it was uncertain which would take off. However, they had not yet verified results with field testing in PCS and it would have been more difficult to make the sell to those customers. 2. How is the purchase decision different between buying an entire system (i.e. an entire base station) and only a component? How might this affect ISC’s pricing strategy? Complete base stations are only purchased for new locations. Otherwise, base stations components are replaced as needed such as for component updates and

More about Illinois Super Conductor

Open Document