With regard to both the cases here, you will be required to represent yourself. An attorney is not permitted to represent you in small claims court. Because the amount you have loaned to Dan is over $25,000, this case will have to be filed in the Superior Court in Los Angeles. This court has proper jurisdiction. In this case, our firm can represent you.
PA205: Introduction to Legal Analysis and Writing, Unit One, Assignment 1) The case study references section 42.09 (a)(3) of the Texas Penal Code. The statute prohibits the desecration of a venerable object. 2) Legislative 3) The passage discusses the court case that involved State V. Johnson (Gregory Lee Johnson) 4) The three courts that heard this case: 1) Texas Court of Criminal Appeals (most authority) 2) Texas Court of Appeals 3) Dallas County Criminal Court (least authority) 5) Texas v. Johnson, 491 U.S. 397 (1989) 6) The Texas statute was struck down since the Supreme Court ruled it was inconsistent with the First Amendment. 7) Statutory law are law passed by sending a bill by passing it through a legislative body. Statutes are created when original court cases are heard and ruled upon.
PA 205-04: Introduction to Legal Analysis and Writing Professor Brandy Kreisler Unit 1 Assignment Abstract This analysis will go over what occurred in Texas during the Johnson v. Texas Supreme Court case. Looking into what statue was in place and what it prohibited; further explaining which branch of government created the statue. Along with which courts where involved. The state of Texas had placed a statue that criminalizes the desecration of the American flag (Texas Penal Code Section 42.01(a)(3): [Good!] Desecration of venerable object).
Running Head: CONSTITUTIONAL PROTECTIONS The Constitutional Procedures Deborah Llamas Kaplan University CJ500-01N Professor Gordon Crews March 6, 2013 The Fifth Amendment referred to as the Bill of Rights implemented because of the standard method “I Plead the Fifth” (Bill of Rights, 2008). The four basic clauses associated with the Fifth Amendment include, the grand jury clause: that no individual held responsible in justifying a capital, or either heinous crime, unless on a claim or demand by a Grand Jury. The Grand Jury Clause is an essential component because it requires a grand jury in capital cases to prevent a person charged without evidence, determined by a Grand Jury
The trial ct determined the custom was valid and entered judgment, the insurance companies appealed and won at the S. Ct. of N. C. In 1952, pl’s brought action against the df’s claiming dfs were negligent in prosecuting pl’s actions against the insurance companys by using an improper service of process, and failure to issue alias summons at the time initial action was pending. Legal Issue(s): Whether the dfs breached a standard of care to act as a reasonably and prudent person, exercising the same or similar degree of knowledge and skill ordinarily possessed by others of his profession similarly situated ? Court’s Holding: No. Procedure: Trial ct dismissed, affirmed.
Susan Kulstad PA 250-01 Family Law Unit 5 April 23, 2013 Common Wealth of Massachusetts The Trial Court Division ________ Probate and Family Court Department Docket No. _______ Complaint for Divorce Pursuant to G.L. c. 208 § 1B Patty Bean, Plaintiff V. David Bean, Defendant 1. Plaintiff who resides at 123 West Golf Rd., Boston, Suffolk County, MA 12345, was lawfully married to the defendant who now resides at 456 East Lark St., Boston, Suffolk County, MA 12345. 2.
Only seven states ratified the 27th Amendment in the 18th century, and after the seventh did so, it took the eighth state almost 81 years to ratify it, and another 105 years in addition for the ninth state. Only due to one student, Gregory Watson of the University of Texas at Austin, and his valiant letter-writing campaign, did this amendment even get resurfaced attention, let alone a serious look at ratification. Over 202 years after its proposition, the amendment became a part of the United States Constitution. Even with this amendment in place, it does not address the larger issue of congressional pay itself. While the prohibition of immediate pay raises does help the problem on a smaller level, it does not do
The answer to what could convince a court to convert the Refco LLC Bankruptcy Case into Chapter 7 Bankruptcy could be located in Securities, Comedies, Contract, and Trusts Law. Thus, my argument before the Bankruptcy Court would be simple and straightforward. I would first argue that when I initially contracted with Refco to trade FOREX that a Trust was formed. The property in the Trust was never owned by Refco, but instead belonged to the Trust, which was holding it so that I could trade in the FOREX markets. In this argument I would cite supporting case law from various bankruptcy cases dealing with Commodities Brokers
The song titled "Rosa Parks" appears on the act's third album. A federal judge ruled against Parks on November 18, 1999, stating that OutKast's right to use Parks' name is protected by the First Amendment to the Constitution. The group was not required to pay
(2) Power Regarding Representation in Tax Matters The power to represent me, and to appoint an agent or agents to represent me, before the Internal Revenue Service or any State or other taxing authority by completing, signing, and submitting IRS Form 2848 or any other governmental form. UNLESS YOU DIRECT OTHERWISE HEREIN, THIS POWER OF ATTORNEY IS EFFECTIVE IMMEDIATELY AND WILL CONTINUE UNTIL IT IS REVOKED. CHOOSE ONE OF THE FOLLOWING ALTERNATIVES BY CROSSING OUT THE ALTERNATIVE NOT CHOSEN: (A) Effective Immediately: This power of attorney is effective immediately and is not affected by my subsequent disability or incapacity. (B) Effective Upon Disability or Incapacity: This power of attorney becomes effective upon my disability or incapacity. YOU SHOULD CHOOSE ALTERNATIVE (A) IF THIS POWER OF ATTORNEY IS TO BECOME EFFECTIVE ON THE DATE IT IS EXECUTED.