They are your proof, evidence, etc. Sub-assertions MUST be identified by CAPITAL LETTERS. Have you looked at the setup and organization of my Outlining Lecture? I think not. Please study it carefully.
I chose to listen to the speech by Elie Wiesel titled, “The Perils Of Indifference”. I listened carefully to see if I could detect any bias, fallacies, or other rhetorical devices within his speech, and I evaluated how they made me feel. I did not detect any bias in the speech, but I did notice several fallacies and rhetorical devices. For example: The statement “These failures have cast a dark shadow over humanity” is an example of a Metaphor. I say this because he is comparing the failure of our country to a show that is looming over us.
The information in the article wasn’t just made up, general statements however. The author went to credible sources for his information. Among these sources included a law professor and top scholar on church-state conflicts named Douglas Laycock who was able to provide a professional and educated view on the likely actions that will be taken in order to protest the act including taking cases to the supreme court. Next, the author moves to the side of the debate that supports the birth control section in the act. By including statistics and reputable sources such as the National Women’s Law Center, the author emphasized the credibility of his information.
During the interview, it can clearly be seen that whenever he says “yes” he literally shakes his head no. This is a subconscious act, meaning that they do not believe what they are saying. In an article, it says that it is extremely crucial to listen to emphasis on words. This cue can come off as misleading. If one is telling the truth, they will shake/nod their head as an accent to show that they simply mean what they say.
The author quickly establishes his aversion towards noisemakers in movie theaters by calling himself the shusher. But before he becomes the shusher, he has a few steps to take.”My usual procedure is to start with a glare at the offender. Glares are unfortunately quite ineffective when the noisemakers sit in front of you.” The author continues on with what happens next when his previous steps happen to fail. One of his steps includes having an internal battle with himself. “I then usually undergo an internal struggle, asking myself, Who am I to set myself up as a policer of
He speaks carefully, weightily, and has a disconcerting habbit of looking hard at the person he adresses before actually speaking" This continues the idea of how the Inspector has a large affect on people and shows how he is going to interogate each family member later on in the play. This is an effective description as it conveys how Inspector Goole can be rather intimidating in the way he looks and addresses the characters in the
Steinbeck has mentally and emotionally on purpose created two completely opposite characters. We get the sense that George is a parental figure towards Lennie as when George asks Lennie, do you remember where we’re going now? Lennie “looked startled and then in embarrassment hid his face against his knees”, ” I forgot again”. This enables us to understand Lennie’s obliviousness, he doesn’t even remember where he’s going, and he must follow George as though he is his ‘daddy’. Although Lennie is ashamed of his self and ‘embarrassed’ as he “hid his face against his knees”, he has respect for George and is sorry to disappoint him.
Normally, we would not argue about children, but the statement that was made by me was taken out of context. We ended up settling everything, but that just goes to show how things can go left if you are miscommunicating with other people. Miscommunication is described as a lack of clear or adequate communication. In order to make sure that a miscommunication does not happen in the future, you have to make your voice well heard. Make sure that you are saying things in a way that it cannot be mistaken for anything other than it is.
To keep himself calm, he stopped breathing so not to get excited by my scent. He wished that he could do the same thing to his skin; since it was extra-sensitive it was quite...not unpleasant (far from that, really), but more unwanted. He kept telling himself to keep control, that one wrong move could cripple his little me , and he immediately got control of
John Proctor’s confession to lechery is a key moment in the play. It signifies his decision to not belong to the court, and instead t o show loyalty to Elizabeth and his marriage. His character through the course of the act moves through emotions of outrage, despair, shame and uneasiness and delivers his confession with fragility, working with Miller’s stage directions- “his voice about to break and his shame great”- but speaking with force and power at the same time. All else on stage are silent while Proctor ‘holds the spotlight’ to further illuminate the significance of his short-lived monologue. Marry Warren’s character is automatically related to by the audience as a shy, outspoken and a very insecure character- this is achieved through her tentative and quiet voice.