How Successful Was Baldwin in Dealing with the General Strike of 1926?

878 Words4 Pages
How successful was Baldwin in dealing with the General Strike of 1926? (24) At the time the General Strike was viewed as a major challenge to the government. However the strike was a complete failure, not achieving any of the miner’s aims and leading to more restrictive legislation. This failure was partly due to the strength of Baldwin’s government it but was more a result of the strikers’ own weaknesses. Baldwin was prepared for a general strike in 1926. There were members of his Cabinet who wanted a strike to happen. His success in delaying the strike from 1925 and using that time to prepare was one of the reasons he was able to win. The TUC originally threatened a general strike in support of the miners on 31 July 1925. This was in response to the mine owners attempting to reduce miners’ wages despite agreeing to protect wages under the previous (Labour) government. However the government gained time by subsidising the miners’ wages while the Samuel Commission investigated the mining industry. This committee issued its report in 1926 and, although it made recommendations about the total restructuring of the mining industry, it also decided that the miners should accept a pay cut. As a result the miners decided to strike and, again, called on the Trades Union Congress (TUC) to support them. The government seemed prepared to negotiate and started talks with TUC leaders in Downing Street. However the government’s strength and confidence in its own position was shown by the enthusiasm of some of its members – including Churchill and Lord Birkenhead – to have a show-down with the unions. They were so confident that they were prepared to force a confrontation. They used the excuse of the strike by printers on the Daily Mail to stop talks with the unions (although the TUC was still ready to negotiate) and declare a state of emergency instead. In the time it had after
Open Document