How Far Was Is It the First World War That Was Essentially Responsible for the Downfall of the Romanovs in 1917?

1295 Words6 Pages
In 1917 after 300 years of ruling Russia, the Romanov dynasty was toppled by the appetite for change. I believe that the First World War was responsible for the downfall of the Romanovs. The main difference between the 1905 ‘revolution’ and the 1917 revolutions was that the army sided with the revolutionaries in 1917. This being the key reason as to why Autocracy fell. When Russia entered World War 1 in 1914 to when they left in 1917, they suffered numerous military defeats. They originally had made good progress when advancing into the German Empire, however, this advance stopped when they lost the battle of Tannenberg and the Masurian lakes. These were crushing defeats which brought heavy casualties, 4 million Russian men died in the first year of the war. With such a huge amount of casualties, it is obvious that Russian morale wasn’t at a high level. The low levels of morale weren’t helped by the appalling state of supplies to the armed forces. Soldiers were poorly equipped, guns and munitions had to be shared between men. Some soldiers went into battle without guns and had to salvage from the dead to equip themselves. There were so few supplies due to low amounts of production and inefficient supply lines and not enough vehicles to transport the supplies. The Russians started the war with 20,000 locomotives and by 1917, they only had 9,000. All of the army’s failings got bigger when Tsar Nicholas assumed the position of Direct Commander in Chief of the armed forces in August 1915. This meant that he then got the blame for any military defeats which occurred from then on. The Tsar was amateurish when it came to the job of commanding the armed forces. The unpopularity on him heightened when Russia lost several battles after he became in control. The lack in faith of the Russian high command links into the low morale of the Russian army. In 1916 alone,
Open Document