Haroun and the Sea of Stories

878 Words4 Pages
An important feature in Salman Rushdie’s Haroun and the Sea of Stories (1991) is the presence of sets of opposites. We see that these pairs of opposites must be reconciled for the conflict to be resolved and for the story to proceed to its happy ending. The existence and eventual unification of these opposites are parts of a mythic pattern that Joseph Campbell details in his book The Hero with a Thousand Faces (1949). One such pair of opposites is Gup and Chup, the rival nations of Kahani, the fictitious moon that Haroun visits. Others include Shadow and Person and, ultimately, imagination and rationality. The resolution of these three pairs of opposites leads the story to its happy ending. According to Campbell, myths and mythic stories all follow a pattern of two cycles: the cosmogonic cycle and the monomyth.The cosmogonic cycle is “the mythic image of the world’s coming to manifestation and subsequent return into the nonmanifest condition” (Campbell 259). In other words, the cosmogonic cycle is the path from the divine unity of the universe, the “unconsciousness,” to what Campbell calls the “superconsciousness” (Campbell 259), or state of the universe that contains individuals and opposites, and back again. The monomyth, on the other hand, is the “mythological adventure of the hero” (Campbell 30). This is the general path that the mythic hero travels to complete his quest. The two cycles are intertwined. As the cosmogonic cycle descends from the unconscious to the conscious, the world loses touch with the divine. “And then a savior will be born [...]” (Campbell 264). At this point the hero, the “savior,” will follow the monomyth. The hero’s adventure represents the moment he achieves “illumination” and opens the “road to the light” (Campbell 259). The hero leads the world up this “road” along the cosmogonic cycle towards perfect unity. Then, the cycle begins
Open Document