The people present in the region started to transition from their nomadic lifestyles to agricultural lifestyles because of the surety and safety the rivers gave in providing farmable land to produce ample food. As more and more people settled in the region, urbanization and surplus occurred. No longer was the society farming to solely support itself, but it was able to export and interact with surrounding societies. The rivers provided the necessary elements for abundant agricultural growth which in turn allowed for the society to grow beyond focusing on basic needs for survival and develop to create political structure and develop artistically. (Kreis,
Their agricultural strength was another component that added to the empire’s power. Trade was also important in the Muslim world. The Islamic people traded across the silk roads, linking once again China and the Mediterranean basin. Agricultural production would increase the amount of cities in the Arabs making refined business practices a necessity. This would cause the establishment of banks and the sakk, a forerunner of checks.
Egypt then became an intricate, official situation in which a centralized government was essential to permanence and wealth. Egyptians relied on their crops and the ability to manage food for their wealth and permanence. It was the large amount of food supplies that measure Egyptians wealth. The funds of their manufacture and the sharing of wealth were controlled by the pharaoh. Images on tombs of the pharaohs demonstrated the possessions of their reign.
Comparative Essay: Mesopotamia and Egypt Ever since the rise of humans, the foragers became curious of the environment around them and because of that, many changes began to take place. As humanity learned the ways of agriculture and the ways to produce better and stronger weapons, it pointed out the first signs of civilizations. Instead of hunting all the time and following herds of animals, people started growing their own food and developed a very reliable source of nutrition. The people of these ancient times also started trading with each other and this caused the attraction of other people from different countries. Throughout all of these changes, the first civilizations of mankind were born.
They created the social classes were the “base” people were the ones who worked and “fed” the whole civilization. They also created several government systems such as reigns, tyrannies and much later democracies. Other physical features that leveraged the growth of civilizations were the natural barriers such as mountains, desserts and oceans. These features protected the early (and weak) civilizations. In document 3 you can see that the Indus valley civilization was well protected by The Himalaya Mountains, the Thar Desert and the Arabian Sea.
The Aztecs and Incas were two of the strongest and greatest ancient empires in history that each had a long list of advances and achievements. But over all, the characteristics of the Incan Empire in terms of advancements in technology, military, and government were more modern than the Aztec Empire. This concept of modernity is based on a judgment concerning the time period in history and the area where it took place. What I consider modern are acts and advancements that extend upon and break the previous barriers and beliefs of the time period to work towards a fuller development. Although the Incas were more advanced and modern in their ways, the Inca and Aztec Empires were similar in some of the aspects that allowed them to be so successful and powerful.
1. Even though imperialism existed to some extent before the industrial revolution, it gave industrialized countries many reasons to peruse it. Vast raw materials are needed to properly maintain a strong industrial economy. Many believe the industrial revolution began in Great Britain, which was very powerful but small in terms of land, population, and available resources. This gives them an incentive to colonize areas where there are large amounts of raw material instead of just paying for the materials.
These civilizations also shared another similarity. These civilizations both built irrigation systems to carry out water from the rivers. Mesopotamia canalled the waters from the Tigris and Euphrates Rivers. Egypt built irrational canals to control the waters from the Nile. This was a similarity between Egypt and Mesopotamia because during this time period people relied on water for many things such as drinking, bathing and most importantly for keeping their land fertile.
Persians And Egyptians Persia was a more successful nation than Egypt, the civilization was better organized, more advanced and better had leadership. How did the Nile contribute to the successfulness of the Egyptians? Was it only the Nile alone that made them so successful? Did the geography of the land where the Egyptians lived help them? How did the Persians become so successful?
Hammurabi experienced many military victories during the ending period of his reign, he was not a great builder. By builder I mean he was not able to build his city-state into a well balanced structure. Hammurabi did not develop a functional bureaucracy and chose to follow dictatorial approach to governance. He was good at building temples, city walls, irrigation and fighting wars but relies upon his supporters to survive as a ruler. Hammurabi is one of the most recognized rulers of his time but it would not be correct to say he was the most