Hamlet’s Moral Revenge

1076 Words5 Pages
Why does Shakespeare give so much prominence to Hamlet’s delay in killing Claudius without clearly presenting the reason for it? There is one thing that the audience must notice in order to bring value to this question. Shakespeare makes it clear that Hamlet is aware of a delay in killing Claudius as demonstrated when Hamlet has the chance to kill Claudius but does not. This awareness gives the reader reason to believe that the delay is not just an occurrence in the play to further the story line. Hamlet is a moral and intelligent man, he is aware of what is right and wrong and it is due to this morality that he delays the murder of Claudius and ended the cycle of revenge. After conversing with the ghost of his own father, Hamlet already devises a plan to kill Claudius in order to fulfill the ghost’s wishes to get revenge. However, much time passes throughout the play when Hamlet could have taken his revenge but he has yet to complete the deed. He admits he may have been deceived by the ghost when he says, "The spirit that I have seen / May be a devil, and the devil hath power / T' assume a pleasing shape (II:ii, 627-629). Hamlet delays the murder of his uncle due to the doubt he has in the validity of the information provided by the ghost. If Hamlet completely trusted the story that the ghost provided him with, he would have easily committed the murder in a more timely manner. Clearly doubt is one of the causes for Hamlet’s delay before finally killing Claudius. Hamlet delays the murder of his uncle since he is not a man of direct confrontation. Hamlet demonstrates peaceful ways when he arranged a getaway on a pirate ship. Moreover Hamlet also changes lines in the play that is performed in front of Claudius in order to get a reaction from him to confirm whether or not Claudius killed King Hamlet or not. Rather than confronting Claudius face to face, Hamlet chooses
Open Document