264,000 / 25,000 hrs = $10.56 2650 hrs x 10.56 = $27,984 (d) Sum-of-the-years’-digits. n(n+1) = 10(11) = 55 10/55 x 264,000 x 1/3 = $16,000 9/55 x 264,000 x 2/3 = $28,800 Total = $44,800 (e) Double-declining-balance. 279,000 x 20% x 1/3 = $18,600 [279,000-(279,000x20%)] x 20% x 2/3 = $29,760 Total = $48,360 E11-9 (Composite Depreciation) Presented below is information related to Morrow Manufacturing Corporation. Machine | Cost | Estimated Salvage Value | Estimated Life (in years) | A | $40,500 | $5,500 | 10 | B | 33,600 | 4,800 | 9 | C | 36,000 | 3,600 | 8 | D | 19,000 | 1,500 | 7 | E | 23,500 | 2,500 | 6 | Instructions (a) Compute the rate of depreciation per year to be applied to the machines under the composite method. A: 40,500/10=4050 B: 33,600/9=3733 C: 36,000/8=4500 D: 19,000/7=2714 E: 23,500/6=3916 Total Straight-line depreciation = $18,913 Total Cost = $152,600 Depreciation Rate = 18,913/152,600 = 12.4% (b) Prepare the adjusting entry necessary at the end of the year to record depreciation for the year.
1-6 Ending retained earnings $278,000. 1-8 (b) Net income $34,154. 1-9 Common stock $30,000; Cost of goods sold $55,000. 1-10 (b) Ending retained earnings $24,000; total assets $125,000. 1-11 (b) Net income $1,005.1.
Operating income moved along the same path for the period albeit at a lower rate. The company’s invest ment in its self-insurance fund and interest income contributed significantly to the difference between operating income and net income. Revenue fell off by 12% in 2009 however; it increased by 22% in 2010. The company was able to increase it domestic and commercial rate after an application was made to the Fair Trading Commission. Fuel expenses grew at a faster rate than sales, fuel costs although seeing a fall off in 2009 by 20.52% rose by 29% in 2010.
A couple of points to look at include the fact that utility expense increased 11% year over year. Considering the fact that production, sales and selling expenses were down this could indicate inefficiency in the company. The company also significantly cut back in research and development. In the previous period this was one of the fastest growing expenses. This may have been for any number of reasons, however if this was cut simply to conserve cash it could result in slower growth in the long term.
Hallstead Jewelers Required: How has the breakeven point in number of sales tickets (number of customers orders written) and breakeven in sales dollars changed from 2003, to 2004, and to 2006? How has the margin of safety changed? What caused the changes? The breakeven point has increased for both sales dollars and sales tickets from 2003 to 2006. The safety margin has also decreased over the time period.
State the place value of the underlined digit in 6 953 742. A Hundreds C Ten thousands B Thousands D Hundred thousands ( 3. Round off 5 987 341 to the nearest hundred thousand. A 5.8 million C 6.0 million ( B 5.9 million D 6.1 million 4. Which of the following numbers, when rounded off to the nearest thousand, becomes 7 541 000?
We see this again from 2004 all the way to 2010 with unemployment increasing to 10%. We can see that the economy hits a recession after roughly 10 years of gradual expansion. Okun’s Law states that for every 1% rises in Unemployment, GDP decreases by roughly 3%. The above Scatter Plot chart shows data from 1981 to 2010 and we can see that for every 1% rise in Unemployment over this period, GDP dropped by 0.4%. This shows a negative slop and that the relationship is relatively weak due to the fact the GDP has decreased by less than 1%.
Sales grew 33% in 06 and 22% in 07. There is a gap in the growth coming from sales where income is lost due to the increase in raw material prices and forecasted demand which led to an inventory cut. 4. Which is the EBITDA margin? | 05 | 06 | 07 | EBITDA Margin | 8.6% | 15.6% | 9.7% | 5.
Audi's global sales rose 8.3% to 1.58 million vehicles in 2013 however despite the increase in revenue, the net profit fell 7.7% ($5.57billion) and the operating profit margin fell to 10.1% from 11% the previous year. Based on this one could assume Audi is experiencing diseconomy of scale. But when you dig deeper into their situation the reasons for a lower net profit is not because of a “per-unit” cost of production which would truly mean they are operating as a diseconomies of scale. The true reasons appear to be because of their expansion investments. As per the article Audi “warned that profit would be hit by investment in new models and tougher climate regulation”.
iii)There is very little increase in SG&A as not much was spend in terms of sales effort. iv)AR increased significantly with some of the promissory notes are payable in June 1994 (6 months after sale) v)Probably increase marketing, promotional and expenses related to discounts in the subsequent year due to “Premier Vision” plan. This impact is significant. From the statements, B&L reported a 13% YoY increase in sales revenue. However, exhibit 6 showed that there was a decline in market demand for conventional lenses, but an increase in both planned replacement and disposal lenses.