[Shocked and angry.] Abby!” (Miller, 1045). Abigail accuses Tituba of being a witch because it will save her reputation from being soiled. In “Let’s All Feel Superior”, Joe Paterno and Mike McQueary were in a position where in order to save their jobs they had to keep information confidential to the rest of the public. “…whose indignation is based on the assumption that if they had been in Joe Paterno’s shoes, or assistant coach Mike McQueary’s shoes, they would have behaved better, They would have taken action to stop any sexual assaults.” (Brooks, Paragraph I).
They believed that abortions were okay even though they knew they were being put in situations in which there was a possibility of them having multiple fetuses. The way the parents in the stories dealt with their conflict were by the style of problem solving. The parents felt by eliminating the baby, they would be eliminating any future problems. The topic of abortions is very controversial, some people believe they are acceptable while others think it is purely evil and wrong. I am on the fence about abortions.
“Relativist ethics are unfair.” Discuss. Relativist Ethics are not unfair in today’s society, as they change depending on the situations and are subjective, dealing with smaller details of actions. In the modern day, situations all have factors that can give them good or bad motives. For example, the subject of abortions differs depending on the person. Some may say that it should be allowed because it allows rape victims to abort an unwanted child.
Response Revisions for “Texting May Be Taking a Toll” Heather Daniel Eng 101-18 In Katie Hafner’s article, “Texting May Be Taking a Toll”, she uses logos to build her ethos effectively, by not only providing links to support her information, but also by getting her information from credible sources. For example, she quotes what many psychologist, and professors that have studied to make her argument valid. She also uses the information to state her opinion for her, in her argument. The author also has an interesting invention to her writing, which makes it easy and enjoyable to read. I feel like she provides accurate information, to put across her argument, which is clearly texting is not positively affecting teenagers, without having to actually state her own opinion.
The dangers of smoking and anorexia both are very perilous, and to be connected with 'harmless' suntanning 'shocks' readers. The words "religiously" and "obsession" also underline its severity, with the word "confesses" making it appear almost criminal. The fact that she may have lost her baby as a result of sunbed-tanning, makes the whole invention seem threatening. People are more likely to believe someone if they are an expert or doctor on the subject of matter and are therefore easily impressed, regardless of whether all of what they say is understood. Cayte Williams uses this to her advantage with the introduction of Doctor Julia Bishop as a "consultant dermatologist at St James' University Hospital in Leeds".
Author Kendra Cherry defines in her own words the definition of positive thinks and what she thinks of it. She carefully detailed all possibility of why positive thinking could eventually help someone. Also in the article, Cherry included the wide range of benefits health benefits, and the difference between positive thinking, and positive psychology. Even though this website is known as a non-scholarly, this source is reliable and has a lot to do with my research topic because not only does it respond to the question, but give detailed about the topic. Kendra Cherry is a well-known writer, educator that concentrates on helping her students understand the concept of
Hence, the women who Hebson interviewed were more likely to give answers that were more in depth and valid. However, Hebson's research method can be criticised by positivists for being unscientific as they argue that unstructured interviews lack a number of characteristics which they see as essential in scientific research, such as reliability and objectivity. Hebson's unstructured interviews may lack reliability as each woman that she interviewed is different and it depends on the unique relationship established between the interviewer and interviewee. Her research cannot be replicated by another sociologist. Hebson's research methods may lack objectivity as she had a personal relationship with the interviewees.
People may feel like it would do more harm than good. The fact is, however, that the drug users themselves are to blame for taking these benefits away from the family members that truly need it. If we were to look at this from another view it might make more sense. In the workplace, for instance, if you fail a drug test, there is a simple solution……no job. It would make sense to do the same for public assistance.
Anna Frith’s concern for others pushes her to overcome her fears and help those who are less fortunate than herself. Merry Wickford is at risk of losing her family mine and so Anna is determined to retrieve the plate worth of lead. Her fear of mines is evident when she proclaims; ‘…the greatest effort was to keep my panic banked. I tried to manager my terrors.’ But for the sake of Mary she pushes these fears aside. Anna’s concern for others is again shown when she overcomes her fear when helping Mary Daniels give birth to her child.
Some of the things in the Review were edited because it spoke of diseases that women could get, but Sanger pushed on because she wanted to get the information out to the women (Murphree & Gower, 2013). Some of the judgmental people that were putting the Review down were women saying that it was immoral for women to take birth control. That if women took birth control, they were dishonoring their husbands (Murphree & Gower, 2013). Women should not be judged on wanted to take birth control and use other contraceptives to prevent themselves from getting pregnant and