Goldbricking And Quota Restriction In Machine Shop

922 Words4 Pages
Roy, Donald (1952) “Quota restriction and goldbricking in a machine shop” What are the main aims of the article? One of the aims of Roy Donald’s (1952) article was to provide study for the restrictions of industrial output, trough participant observation of the group behavior in the production line. Observations were made during 11 months of work as a radial-drill operator in a machine shop of steel processing plant, which was classic piecework production line at the time. The researcher recorded his work and production openly, but without revealing his academic position either to workers or management. His findings are based on the inside activities and conversations of the work group to which he belong, being “one of the boys on the line”. Restrictions of the output were presented into two main types, according to the mode of the jobs. Bimodal pattern - the rule of the shop, was created by workers which divided jobs on “gravy” - easy jobs where earnings could be made with little effort, and “stinker” - difficult jobs where earnings were too low in relation to the work required, so workers would lower their effort and relay on the payment of 85 cents per hour which was their “base rate” or minimum amount. On the “gravy” jobs workers applied “quota restriction” – limiting their output in order to avoid eventual lowering on the price or increasing the output request. On the “stinker” jobs workers would lower their effort or intentionally slow down the production by “goldbricking” or “holding back” and demand price increase. Roy presented his findings of the restriction of output with rough measuring of the same, with estimation on the amounts according to his own work, and fellow operator’s production. What are the main theoretical findings of the article? One of the main focuses in the researches of output

More about Goldbricking And Quota Restriction In Machine Shop

Open Document