Mongol Rule in China vs. Russia Due to the Mongols ultimate desire for economic power, the Mongols highly affected both Russia and China in both political and economic aspects. When the Mongols invaded both territories, they destroyed a lot and the key differences and similarities come from how it became reconstructed. Many similarities in politics and economics arose such as the way the facilitated trade, and how their economies dropped. However, many differences occurred like the way they ran the governments, their centers of power, and how the Mongols fell from both states. In many ways, both states were extremely similar in the way Mongols ruled them.
Being in a foraging society had some advantages and disadvantages and being in an urbanized society also had some advantages and disadvantages. In a foraging society they heavily relied on weather since they had to find there own food and that was a bad disadvantage. If there was good weather then they could go out and search for food but if there was bad weather then it would be extremely difficult to search for and get food and in the Paleolithic age, they needed all the food they could get in order to survive. In an urbanized society, they relied on weather too but they often would have surplus so they did not rely on it as much. In a foraging society, they had to hunt and gather their own food which was a big disadvantage because that means they had to constantly be moving around because one area could not keep a society alive for a whole lifetime.
They could be making more money per unit if they would tighten up their processes. They make two types of anchors. The bell type and the snag hook type. They have to stop production when they get an order for the opposite type of anchor and this down time for set up is very inefficient and costs a great deal. It takes about 36 hours to make the switch.
As Sainsbury's have a hierarchical structure they are most likely to lose a lot of money because for the marketing and research and development departments to carry out their functions they would need funding from the finance department. For this information to get to the finance department a lot of time would have been wasted and also for the finance department to reply to them, all this would cost them a lot of money. Advantages of Sainsbury's is that the power they have would be successful for the business as when work is being done the communication of the workers together when given commands from the manager and having to work better for the manager to impress them in order for more work to be done and at a more well-organized rate then if there was no pressure from the manager. Disadvantages would be that the workers would start to get stressed from having to complete the workload at too fast a pace for them to work at all times that they will start to work less and dislike there job and some days may not want to work as they are stressed to do work which is too much for them to cope as they are trying too hard to impress, this could lead to employees wanting to quit their job. Advantages are that when having to complete work set out by the manager to the employees it can be done efficiently so that the manager will be able to assess the employee and they could get a promotion to a higher part of their job.
Lastly, running full time with too many employees while the center is slow. Steps (1-3) 1 Identify and diagnosing the problem- The problem is they have slow times Monday through Friday mornings, and Thursday through Sunday afternoon. If they don’t fix their operation times there expenses are going to rise. 2 Generating alternative solutions- they should change operation times, and try not the business 24 hours every day. They could open late instead of mornings and get rid of slow peak mornings.
II. Main Point #2: Credit is important because it can often dictate what we can and can’t have. A. Subpoint: Good credit can help us with purchasing a new vehicle with a loan at a low interest rate. We can qualify for credit cards at low rates and no fees. Purchase things that otherwise we couldn’t pay with cash because of the higher cost.
The weakness of Kudler Fine Foods is that an IPO (Initial Public Offering) has many inherent and potential weaknesses that must be examined prior to selection as a means for expansion. An IPO is the first sale of stock by a company. There are many advantages and disadvantages for the Kudler Fine Foods to go public through the IPO. The advantages include generating more capital needed to expand their three locations The IPOs are very expensive undertaking, and a large portion of any capital acquired will be lost to this cost. Because the company must produce all financial information to the SEC many businesses find it to be very stressful and time consuming which takes time and money away from a company that is thriving like Kudler Fine Foods.
Overstating projections A problem that can arise from starting the budget is when the person who created the budget gets an idea that the business will sell more items than the business is realistically able to do. If this happens the business will spend a lot of money on items that the budget believe the business will sell but in reality the business will not be able to sell this stock. IF the business is in the food industry and this problem happens it will end up going to waste as food goes off. This will result in the business losing a lot of money which they could spend elsewhere and if the business doesn’t have much money this money could have been used to pay off their expenses. If the business does lose this money they might
Taro is much more work. You've got to plant it one by on unlike wheat your throw your hand to spread the seed, and these New Guinea crops can't be stored for years the way wheat can-they rot quickly and need to eaten in a short time. They're also low in
It would also help alleviate all the back log of pending matters. “What can we so about the traffic problem? The answer would be, nothing –until we get more roads. You couldn’t help it by tinkering around with the lights. Well, tinkering with the courts, more DAs more Legal Aids, more judges- and it’s going to cost a massive amount of money.” (Bonsignore, et al 2006.