Fourth Of July Oration Speech Analysis

1010 Words5 Pages
The Fourth of July Oration speech is said by Frederick Douglass in 1852. He opens his speech, by speaking about how young the nation is. In the following sentences of “I am glad, fellow citizens...” ( Frederick Douglass, 262) , he explains that having a nation so young is a good thing. The nation is still in the progress of development. Douglass also states that it is easier to make changes in a young nation rather than an older one. Then, he moves on to talking about the revolution. He starts off by saying that we were still under British control seventy six years ago. “To say now that America.....” (Frederick Douglass, 263) is saying that it is easy now for anybody to say that America was right and England was wrong because it is now after…show more content…
They first petitioned and later fought for the independence of our nation. In the middle of his speech, he brings up the topic of slavery. The passages that follow “There are seventy-two crimes.....” ( Frederick Douglass, 266) emphasizes his beliefs of why the slave is a man. He starts off by saying that Virginia has punishments for slaves if he commits a crime. This shows that a slave is responsible for his own actions. This already shows that a slave is a man because if something is property, the owner of the property is responsible for their actions. Next, he points out that a slave can learn how to read and write, just like a man. Then, he says with great empathy that even dogs and cats could distinguish between a slave and an animal. Finally, he lists all the labor that slaves do, and he states that if a slave is not a man, then he would not be able to do all these things because those are the jobs of men. Douglass then opened up the topic of the law and religion. He explains that the nation is full of inconsistencies. He starts off by saying “For black men there is neither...” (Frederick Douglass, 268). This law makes it impossible for slaves to gain freedom. He states that this law sides with the…show more content…
I strongly agree with his idea. The first point he stated was that slaves are subjected to punishment if they commit a crime. This tells me that slaves are responsible for their own actions and gets punished for what he does, just like a man. If slaves were truly property as they say, then the owner of the slave should be held responsible, and not the slave. The next point that Douglass brings out is that slaves can learn how to read and write. To me, this means that they can get an education just like any human being. What enables one to call them property if they can do the same things that a man can do? We cannot imagine a dog being able to read or a cat being able to write. Those are animals, but they are being compared the same as a slave. Another point that Douglass points out is that even animals can tell the difference between a slave from another animal. This makes me wonder why they human beings cannot see what the animals see. But in reality, I think they do know the difference. They know that slaves are no different from any other human being. The reason why they treat them like property is because they want to make more money by not giving the slaves wages. The last point that Douglass brings out to discuss is that slaves do all the labor of a man. This shows that a slave is a man because only men could do those labor. We cannot imagine an animal knowing how to do those labor. All the
Open Document