Football Hooliganism

3082 Words13 Pages
In a world full of conflicting ideologies attempting to oppress each other, one may be willing to do anything necessary to feed one’s greed and create the dominance for one’s ideas and beliefs. These beliefs and ideas differ from country to country, culture to culture, and family to family, yet the conflict remains the same. This supremacy is so alluring, man is inevitably blinded by it; thus seeking it in every aspect of his life. Throughout the history, this greed has been carried and applied to the smallest details in one’s life with the evolution of mankind. The question of how this greed has evolved into violence and brutality still remains unanswered. Perhaps, we should take an inductive approach and question the manifestation of this…show more content…
From the 1960’s and onwards a slow shift took place from a pattern in which attacks on match officials and players predominated over attacks on rival fans, to a pattern in which conflicts between fans and the police became the main form of spectator violence. The main reason behind this shift was the young working class fan groups who were starting to assemble in the cheaper sections of the stadia, usually directly behind one of the goals. At many English stadia, certain areas were becoming exclusive to the young fans, excluding the older football spectators, and changing the conventional ways of watching football. England’s world cup victory in 1966 attracted large numbers of young fans to the stadia, causing even more separation. The group of fans who gathered in the youth ends of the stadia played a very significant role in the development of the English terrace culture, which has replaced chants and songs with a more complex and characteristically violent repertoire. (Spaaij 77). The increasing conflicts and competition between youth groups of opposing football clubs gave rise to an evolving issue of group rivalries. Opposing groups increasingly attempted to ‘take’ each other’s home territories through violence or by intimidation. It was not until the mid 1960s that the government and its respective local bodies…show more content…
Following a sequence of missile throwing at its ground, and under the threat of closure by the Football Association (FA), Everton FC in November 1963 built up fences behind its goals. At that stage, the media expressed ambivalence. On one hand, they had the responsibility of stressing that hooliganism was a “growing menace”, a threat to the English community, yet on the other hand, as mentioned previously, they still demanded the “traditional British approach” to football. The latter side of this ambivalence predominated the reaction of media organs to Everton’s actions. One of the newspapers of the time, News of The World, showed puzzlement and confusion with an article titled “Hooligans?” The Daily Sketch was one of the newspapers to agree with News of the World, with the headline “They’re so friendly!” The 11 February 1964 issue of The Daily Mail took it even a step further and fed the hooligans with its support, advocating and benignly expressing its preference for “hooliganism rather than indifference” (Dunning et al.
Open Document