Fall of the Pooling Method

3702 Words15 Pages
Fall of the Pooling Method By: Ryan Tangedal Actg 525 Perry Solheim December 4, 2012 “The elimination of pooling is one of the most significant and drastic modifications in accounting methodology in many years,” according to CPA Norman N. Strauss, a national director of accounting standards at Ernst & Young, LLP, and a member of the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) emerging issues task force (EITF) (Moehrle, 2001). When Strauss made this statement in 2001, FASB was in the process of shutting down an accounting method that had been around since 1945 (Carleton & Duncan, 1999). This accounting method was the “pooling of interest” method which is applied when a company records the net assets of a company it is acquiring at the book value of the net assets on the acquired company's balance sheet at the time of the merger (McFall, 2008). The pooling method was one of two accounting methods companies used to account for mergers and acquisitions. The alternative and current method, the purchase method, uses the fair value instead of the book value when combining balance sheets for an acquisition (McFall, 2008). Compare and Contrast of Both Methods For a closer look, some common differences between the two alternative methods are as follows: * The pooling method creates a new balance sheet of the merged company. The purchase method does not create a new balance sheet. Actually, the acquired company’s net assets are added to the balance sheet, using its fair market values. * The pooling method could be described as the merging of two companies. The purchasing method treats the merger as an actual investment. * The pooling method does not clearly distinguish between the company acquiring and the company being acquired. The purchase method clearly distinguishes between the two. * The pooling method does not record the

More about Fall of the Pooling Method

Open Document