His criminal family frustrates Sarty in that he just wants to live a normal life. In a rose for Emily” Emily is heavily affected by her relatives. Going insane runs in her family with her great aunt (her dads sister) also being a little crazy. So she is at a disadvantage from the start. Her father doesn’t help the situation because he shields her from the outside world and “chases away potential suitors because none of them are good enough for his daughter” (p.6”A Rose for Emily”).
Goneril and Regan pledge their love for their father, while Cordelia refuses to speak and when probed finally states that she cannot “heave her heart into her mouth,” (Act I p.7 96-97) that she loves him exactly as much as a daughter should love her father, and that her sisters wouldn’t have husbands if they loved their father as much as they claim. An enraged Lear disowns Cordelia and splits her share of the kingdom between the remaining two sisters. This is a prime example of the beginning of destruction across familial, personal and social aspects. Lear pits his daughters against one another in a selfish endeavour to boost his own pride, but in doing this he also destroys a very crucial aspect within the monarchy by removing the one daughter who has not saught out to destroy him and the foundation he had built for his kingdom. In disowning Cordelia this breaks the natural order of things because in doing so he has severed the natural bond that a father and daughter share, as well he has personally destructed himself with this decision because he has given up on his favoured daughter.
Susan Hill conveys the theme of isolation through numerous aspects throughout the novel, this essay will overview and analyse these themes. A classic element to any ghost story is the recurrent conspiracy of silence, although not as scary atmosphere as later Arthur is condemned to a blunt silence upon triggering his haunting memories of his ghostly tale. A contrast is shown when he is previously feels a peaceful cheery family atmosphere until he resorts to feeling "an outsider to the circle". Helping the rear to pitch the situation more, with the noun "outsider" heightening his uncomfortable feel of isolation. Later on in the chapter his conditions worsen upon Edmund awaiting his father's turn.
Here, Kingshaw’s mother is trying to treat both the boys with equal respect.“I shall not make a favourite of my own child”, which is conveyed to the reader constantly as throughout the novel as her respect for her own child declines as her feelings for Mr Hooper increases . Hooper’s hatred for his own Mother peaks when he thinks to himself “He wished she were dead instead of his father” The phrase, “wish she were dead” conveys the fact that Kingshaw’s hatred for her is an extreme one, this is because he feels that he has been forgotten in place of Mr Hooper and Hooper . Also, the fact that he wants her to be replaced by his father, a person who he has never thoroughly met emphasises that he hates his mother who is suppose to be loving and caring more than anyone he has known. A point that is later made when in his mind Kingshaw exclaims, “he hated her more than Hooper now”. This exaggerates his hate for his mother even more as Hooper is Kingshaw’s worst enemy, this suggests that Kingshaw’s worst relationship is with his mother, potentially implying she is the reason for his death.
What- It is the morning after Stanley’s poker night, the morning after he beat Stella. I, (Blanche DuBois) am trying to convince my sister to leave Stanley and to run away with me. I don’t understand how my sister can come back to such a place, much less go back with Stanley who has treated her in such a way. I tell my sister Stella that his behavior with her is animal like and that he is common. I try to convince her that he is not a man that deserves her or her child and that he is not a man who she can live with.
The Differences of the Sons When I read the two different works, I noticed that the author illustrate the two works in different ways, just like Phaedra is a tragedy but Tartuffe is a comedy; the father in Phaedra is not as stupid as the father in the Tartuffe; Phaedra dead in the end of her story but the author didn't do anything to Elmire. However, there are also many similarities in both stories, there sons were trying to help; there stepmothers were doing something bad when their husbands are not around them; and both of the fathers were cheated by someone. The characters which I truly want to talk about are the two sons: Hippolytus and Damis. When we focus on the two characters, as I said, we will find many similarities in the surface, but I prefer to discuss their differences which hide deeper in the story. Hippolytus, the prince who has forbidden love with a capture, when audiences first met him, he was talking about leaving his place to find his father.
Pattyn’s Father blames himself for his past and drowns his guilt in liquor, making him an alcoholic. One who beats Pattyn’s mother, who believes women must succumb to their husband’s actions. Her mother believes her duty is to bear as many children as possible, especially a boy to carry on the family name. But so far Pattyn’s mother has only conceived 7 girls named after famous military generals. Pattyn, being unable to take the stress of home, begins to question her role in life, especially through her father’s eyes.
After he realizes that his wife cannot have children, the craving for her is reduced a great example is quote next, “My mind was racing. I was bombarded with selfish and acquisitive thoughts, seething with scorn for Marie – she was the one, she was defective, not me—bursting to exercise my god given right to child and heir. It’s true, it really is you never want something so much as when somebody tells you can’t have it”(84). This realization fires the narrator’s drive to father a child. The urge of producing offspring elevates the moment he realizes the female he is with won’t satisfy him.
Instead of acting in a mature manner like an adult, she becomes hysterical and exaggerates, “...now here’s Mr. Bennet gone away, and I know he will fight Wickham, wherever he meets him, and then he will be killed, and what is to become of us all?” (192). The fact that she questions the fate of her family if anything should happen to her husband implies that even she is aware of her insufficient mothering. Additionally, her ability to ignore the real issues and magnify the trivial ones, as aforementioned, further glorifies her foolish character and ability to make
In the story "The son's veto the author ridicules prejudice about the social class in a lot of ways . He shows that "the lower class does not have the power to make decisions" and that " poor people can not be gentlemen".When sophy tells Randolf that she wants to marry Sam .Randolf does not agree to it as he thinks that Sam is not a gentleman because he has no wealth or family background . And as we read further it is shown that Randolf's horrid behavior has forced sophy to promise that she will never marry Sam .Judging by how Randolf was treating his mom I would say that it is Randolf who is not treating his mom right and therefore is not a gentle man . It also shows us that since Sophy was from the lower class and was uneducated she could not decide by herself if she actually wanted to marry Sam and had to ask Randolf what to do . but if sophy was educated she would have said yes to him the first time he asked and her life would have been completly different .All of this can be understood from the lines "'Not what you call a gentleman,' she answered timidly.