Explain the Factors That Limit the Power of the Supreme

333 Words2 Pages
Explain the factors that limit the power of the Supreme Court (15 Marks) The Supreme Court has many checks on it to avoid any tyranny as the founding fathers had wanted; this was through checks like the Senate being able to reject nominations of judges, Impeachment and no initiation power. Upon the death or retirement of a judge the president has the task of nominating someone to replace them, to avoid the president nominating someone who largely has similar views as them or overloading a court with conservative or liberal judges after previous appointments the Senate will review the nominations and if they are unhappy with it then it will be rejected and a new nomination must be made, this stops any court from having too much of a political leaning and makes it completely impartial avoiding any tyranny Judges always have the possibility of impeachment as well, although this has never happened to a supreme court justice it did almost happen in 1969 to justice Abe Fortas, who resigned before he could be impeached to avoid having this record to his name. In this justices are always accountable to any scandals or wrong doing within the court meaning they must act in line with what is expected of them. The supreme court has no initiation power, they cannot decide to create a case and review it themselves, they must wait until a case is brought to them before acting upon it, with this balance in place they cannot select a certain area of the Constitution to try and influence an amendment or choose to pass a law without the public wishes. Overall there are several ways the Supreme Court has its power limited, this is through the Senate rejecting nominations, the possibility of impeachment of all justices and the fact that the Court has no initiation power. 45 mark (balance, up to date examples, 6-7 paras, Good conclusion) Does the Supreme Court have too
Open Document