For example: A Service user cannot understand a menu when It is present in a list form , so we could help them make their choice by getting images of meals they would be presented with to eat. Also try to explain the importance of a healthy diet. If the dilemma was to be a reoccurrence or become a bigger issue at meal times, it would be a good idea to report it to the NIC or the service users case manager to then discuss other options available with the chef. 2. Each service user is different and they all like/ dislike different foods.
In his article,” In defense of food “: Michael Pollen established “what is food” and why do American’s eat nonfood in such large quantities?” Definitely, I’m agree about food labels do provide enough information for consumers to make an informed choice about what to feed their bodies. However consumers do not pay attention of the food labels because they do not really know about it as long it’s delicious. Surely, most food provides food labels because it is a
Carolina Agustin Professor Rucker English 104A 25April, 2012 The Perfect Meals for Every Body Type Throughout the book, The Omnivores Dilemma, there have been three main topics the author talked about and made certain points on. For example, industrialization, pastoral hunting, and gathering. As Michael Pollan, the author, informed us about these topics I realized that I knew what the perfect meal for every body type. Most of us believe that maybe we shall fallow the food pyramid and that, that is the answer to healthy food and good nutrition. Like Pollan pointed out in one of his chapters, fast-food is bad for our health and for us in general.
What is your opinion about eating toasted ants, about eating fried frog legs, about eating puppies and kittens? About eating raw monkey brains? Find the idea of eating any of those things totally repulsive. As I sit here and read about different counties customary delicacies I feel very nauseated. But I suppose every country, state or city has their own view on what they consider a delicacies.
Speaking for myself, I would stop eating that food if I knew there was mercury in it, because I care about my body, I know mercury is poisonous, etc, etc, I could go on with a list of reasons as to why I personally would not eat food with mercury in it. I could make a long list about how much recycling would help our environment, or how if everybody was a vegetarian the O-zone wouldn’t be nearly as damaged. The problem with this question “Is Indifference Corrosive?” is that it’s unique to each individual person. In order to be indifferent to begin with, the receiver of the information must assess the information given to them and then the receiver must ask a multitude of questions such as: Will caring about this issue affect me positively or negatively? Will caring affect me at all?
Carter argues to support or enhance the key issues that eating meat is right based on superiority, self-consciousness, reasoning, moral capability, rights, duties, and sentience. Carter shows that the statement that animals have an interest in their own lives and that we should not treat them like things is a cornerstone in many vegetarian theories. But then he questions this argument in that even the smallest insect has an interest in its own life, but you do not see people actively opposing the killing of all living creatures. He also questions the statement that animals can even make this assertion and are not just living out of basic instinct. And, although a creature may try to stay alive, is it doing so out of the fact it doesn't want to die, or the basic instinct that it has to stay alive.
For example, For the Greeks it was believed that it was wrong to eat the dead, whereas the Callatians believed it was right to eat the dead, or the Eskimos saw nothing wrong with infanticide, whereas Americans believed infanticide is immoral. For each culture, the reason for their actions might seem right and make sense but for others´ point of view it might seem
Fish Grocery In “Eating Animals,” Jonathan Safran Foer argues that in Americans’ opinion “dogs and fish do not go together” (29). He states that Americans believe dogs are man’s best friend, so it is taboo for them to eat their own best friends. On the other hand, Americans consider fish as food. As a result, Americans have gone so far with fish consumption that it might even be considered that they are at war with it. Americans catching so many fish that they are risking destroying fish populations.
We humans eat animals for fuel. While it is very much like humankind to feel for the other creatures around, we should not be confused as to which of human or animal requires our attention or empathy more. There are still people in this world who are not treated like human beings; I think we should put our efforts into getting equality for all of humankind not
In sociology class, we have been learning ethnocentrism and cultural relativism. Suppose you were asked to eat toasted ants, fried frog legs, puppies and kittens, or even raw monkey brains; how would you react? Would you eat it? If you were raised in America, there is a 90% likelihood that your answer would definitely be a no with a disgusted look in your face. However, if you were raised in Thailand, Japan, or any Asian country, these might seem delightful to you.