English Only Legislation Literature Review

1176 Words5 Pages
English Only Legislation Literature Review Emmanuel Santiago ENG 201 Professor Sheila Figueroa January 9, 2011 Our country was founded on the ideals of freedom and religious tolerance. America’s founding fathers intended for us to be a nation of tolerance towards cultural diversity too. Early projects by members of Congress to obtain an English only legislation have failed to make any significant progress. Immigrants already understand that success in America cannot be attained without proficiency in the English language. Do we need federal legislation to further assert this fact? Dennis Baron (1991) described a few instances in history around the English only official language debate. According to Baron, xenophobic feelings against German immigrants in the middle of the eighteen century initiated the language issue. The xenophobia against Germans and other Eastern European immigrants was intensified after World…show more content…
Canada has been a colony of both England and France. Much division has been created among supporters of both cultures. Krauthammer mentions language as a key on cultural identity. This cultural division has happened in other countries as well, and language has been a crucial aspect of it. However, it is worth mentioning that America’s only secession attempt, the civil war, had nothing to do with language or assimilation. Nancy Gibbs (2009) describes the secessionist movement in Texas. Anti-federal government ideals and nationalist pride that’s unique in this state provide the grounds to this movement. Most current secession movements do not count with enough popular support to be considered a threat to our nation; like those in Vermont, Hawaii, California and Alaska. The only state that has the popular support and resources to secede in a near future is Texas. Their reasons to possibly secede the American nation have nothing to do with
Open Document