Empathetic Altruism: an Analysis of Modern Theories

798 Words4 Pages
Empathetic Altruism: An Analysis of Modern Theories Laura Helquist PSY342 Portland State University Abstract: Is there such thing as a truly altruistic motive? Altruism is defined as, “A motive to increase another welfare without conscious regard for one’s self-interests.” (Myers, 2010) There are many different altruistic theories as to why we help another person. Whether it’s social exchange, social norms, or evolutionary, it seems that each one steams from a place of self interest. With social exchange we are maximizing rewards while minimizing the cost. This includes internal and external rewards. If a company donates money, its reward is to get it’s name out there, or if a person donates blood, their reward would be an increase of self worth. This also includes the feeling of guilt, if the person chooses not to help another person they know that they will feel guilt about it later, so they end up helping the person. People also help with the expectation that if they help someone then this person will eventually help them back and not hurt them. This is an example of social norms, It’s our responsibility to help those in need. Finally, we help based on our basic gene structure. We are hard wired to not self sacrifice because we would not survive in evolutionary competition. However, It’s been shown that parents will put their child's life before theres, but that’s because it makes it more likely to pass on their genes. All three of these theories come back to a selfish reason for helping, meaning that none of these are truly an act of true altruism. There is one theory out there that suggests that there is really a genuine form of altruism, and that’s the empathy-altruism hypothesis. When someone is feeling empathetic they are more willing to help for selfless reasons. I

More about Empathetic Altruism: an Analysis of Modern Theories

Open Document