Economics Laws – Poor Vs. Wealthy Countries

1031 Words5 Pages
Economics Laws – Poor vs. Wealthy Countries Universal Economic Laws The discussion question posed by the author of our course text book asks if we agree with the idea posed by many social scientists that say poorer Third World countries should not embrace and follow models based on a universal economic law (Skousen, 2010, p. 46). I would tend to agree with that point of view. The large number of variables that would have to be taken into account to produce accurate universal economic models that cover all of the countries in the world seems out of our reach at this time. In fact Skousen states about economic predictions in general – “Uncertainty exists for two reasons: the vast, complex number of factors and players involved in the economy, and the fact that behind the numbers are individuals who are constantly changing and reevaluating their motives. There is always some degree of uncertainty present in human activity” (2010, p. 41). Keeping Skousen’s statement above in mind, it is hard for me to imagine that given all of the history, cultures, religions, and governments in the world that a universal economic law could be constructed that accounted for all possible situations. Of the three economic laws discussed in chapter two of our course text book which are - law of comparative advantage, law of causality, and law of uncertainty -- the law of comparative advantage would seem to apply the least to a poorer third world country. This economic law states that all countries can produce goods at a cost lower than other countries. This law further implies that two nations trading these goods will produce an economic benefit for both. I believe that pooper countries which may be rich in natural resources at the same time may not have the necessary technology, intellectual capacity, government leadership, and/or capital to take advantage of this economic law.

More about Economics Laws – Poor Vs. Wealthy Countries

Open Document