Ebt1 Task 2

2018 Words9 Pages
Task 2 EBT1 Task 2 Western Governors University A. Review Sources of Evidence EVIDENCE | A1) Source Type: Filtered, Unfiltered or General | A2) Appropriateness of Source Evidence | A3) Classification of Evidence: primary research, evidence summary, evidence-based guidelines, or none of these. | American Academy of Pediatrics and American Academy of Family Physicians. (2004). Clinical practice guideline: Diagnosis and management of acute otitis media. | The source of this evidence is classified as filtered. A filtered source or database is one in which there is an inclusion or exclusion criteria applied to the evidence available in the database. | This evidence is appropriate for the nurses to review in considering implementing the practice of watchful waiting related to the treatment of children with otitis media. This article provides specific evidence for watchful waiting and practice guidelines. Guidelines are derived from the investigation and consideration of experts in the field and presented by an established and reliable source. | This evidence is classified as evidence-based guidelines because it presents specific directions to clinical practitioners in the identification, management and treatment of acute otitis media in children based on current and relevant research evidence. | Block, S.L. (1997). Causative pathogens, antibiotic resistance and therapeutic considerations in acute media. | The source of this evidence is classified as unfiltered. The article was published in a journal, which is available in PubMed. PubMed is an unfiltered source, a database in which all available evidence is retrievable without exclusionary criteria. | This evidence is appropriate for the nurses to review in their first meeting because it provides an overview of acute otitis media in children, including the different causative agents and

More about Ebt1 Task 2

Open Document