Does Widespread Unemployment Change The Economic l

317 Words2 Pages
Protectionism is based on world trade; countries will protect its markets from foreign companies diluting the home countries markets with unwanted goods by inducing tariffs, quotas, and nontariff barriers. These barriers can contain legal, exchange and psychological barriers. There are only a few logic and valid arguments for countries to establish more barriers increasing protectionism and unemployment is not one of them. There are many alternatives to maintain employment and reduce unemployment in home countries. Countries experiencing periods of economic growth need to capitalize on the opportunity for as long as that time lasts so new jobs can be created. These times generally arise when the demand for an array of products is high, businesses then can expand their workforce. Increased awareness by people about incentives in paid work such as benefit programs can increase employment and the desire to work. Training policies help the unemployed to attain skills and expand their capabilities to have knowledge in multiple fields of work. By using unemployment for a reason to lean on protectionism, it still means that there will be an overall inadequate amount of resources in the country that will be implementing barriers. Being able to expand the amount of international trade countries should be able generate additional revenue in the country to fuel domestic markets and unemployment situations. Arguments for protective measures against infant industry can be recognized by underdeveloped countries when countries are afraid that domestic competition would not be able with withstand foreign competition. But when measures are taken to ensure protection to markets, it is often difficult to remove protection barriers. In this case, when there is no ideal time of competition, domestic efficiency in these markets is never improved. Other valid and logical arguments to
Open Document