This would make them a serial killer. It is important to catch these criminals and put them behind bars for sure, but is it enough to sentience them to death? Also with all the killing what are the homicide rates telling us? My personal opinion about the death penalty in Illinois is that it is a good thing that it is band, because morally I do not believe a killing should be punishable by another killing. Just like the old saying two wrong don’t make a right.
However, if there is irrefutable evidence of guilt, and the crime committed is truly heinous, the defendant should face death. Finally, death penalty opponents argue that any life is sacred, and that it’s a much “harsher” punishment to put a killer in prison for life with no chance of parole. To
Pohnpei are type of people who are afraid of death if they will hear a prisoner is going to be killed because he or she commits crime. They will surely change because they will be afraid of dying. This will make Pohnpei a very peaceful state. According to Roxanne Rodriquez, author of the book, A Legal Research Guide, stated that these convicted murderers deserve to die (42). The last reason Pohnpei must have death penalty is for the safety for the citizens.
“Different prosecutors in the state have different attitudes,” Tidmarsh said. “The arbitrariness in that sense of the death penalty is, to me, stunning. It’s not the quality of the act [that determines whether someone is put to death] … In many circumstances, it is the quality of the person who decides whether or not to seek the death penalty.” The judicial system deludes all involved to believe they are not responsible for putting someone to death, Tidmarsh
So many non-supporters of the death penalty say they are against it because of racial discrimination, or how it treats humans as like animal, or that it is cruel and unusual, or that retribution is another word for revenge and therefore they believe that life imprisonment is a just enough punishment. But giving a convicted murderer life imprisonment could still result in death by their hands
Mencken and Kroll Essay Capital punishment is a very contentious issue that is disputed by many Americans. Most argue over whether it is morally right or wrong to execute a criminal, but some are more concerned with the treatment of criminals on death row. The essays The Penalty of Death by H.L. Mencken and the Unquiet Death of Robert Harris by Michael Kroll are examples of two different view points of the death penalty and use completely different methods of argument. Kroll appeals to the emotions of the reader through description of the harsh, cruel conditions of death row, whereas Mencken uses dark humor while arguing for support of the death penalty.
I feel it adversely is shown and sought out to enhance the value of human life by demonstrating the old saying “an eye for an eye.” If government were to lower the penalty of murder it would portray that the victims’ loss of life was less significant than that of the murderer. Some opponents feel that a life sentence in prison is a far worse punishment than death. If this is true, then why do so many convicted prisoners put on death row try to appeal and get a lesser sentence? These prisoners who committed the same act outside prison walls are now facing death with no alternative, as their victim had, and aren’t ready to answer to the consequences. In the case of Stephanie Benton, I saw this with my own eyes.
Eonia Hutchins 9/20/13 Death Penalty Room 226 Death penalty is a punishment for a person who committed a crime. However capital crimes and capital offenses will lead people getting the death sentence, which is basically an execution. Most people believe in the death penalty, while others don’t. I strongly don’t agree with these cruel punishments to kill people. Therefore I don’t think a person who committed a very brutal crime doesn’t deserve to die.
I think that trying to rehabilitate a very violent person is a waste of money. I also believe in the three strikes policy. If all states were harsher on criminals of violent crimes and all states had the death penalty maybe that would make these criminals choose to stop doing such violent crimes. If we had the death penalty in place for only murders or criminals who commit repeated violent crimes this would decrease the overcrowding in prisons. Why should law abiding citizens pay to keep criminals in prisons for the rest of their
There are multiple issues that can be considered with regard to the death penalty. Some people will argue against their sentence of death, by saying that this is racial profiling and that they are executing them because of their racial background. With the argument that I have above, it seems clear that there are multiple reason of support of why the death penalty is an effective and good way to punish criminals for the violent acts on our