Critique of Dr. Sandra D. Wilson’s Theory of Change

1419 Words6 Pages
Critique of Dr. Sandra D. Wilson’s Theory of Change Liberty University It was the fall of 1998 when my friend Maggie left for college. I was elated because I would not have to witness someone whom I cared deeply for unknowingly express their pain at the expense of others. My parents allowed Maggie to live in our home after discovering she was kicked out of her foster parent’s housing. It was our senior year of high school and I was stunned to learn that my active, outgoing, lovable and energetic friend never had a stable place to call home. Estranged from her real parents, her moving into our home and experiencing true family love I thought would be my dream come true, but it turned out to be my worse night-mare. For years, I searched for the reasons as to why my friend seemed to victimize me in my own home and from reading Christian author Sandra D. Wilson’s book, I now ponder was it because hurt people, hurt people. Dr. Wilson (2001) expresses in her book that all individuals have experience some type of hurt weather minute or significant. She connotes that deeply scarred and injured individuals, deeply scar and injure others. Dr. Wilson believes that it is a self-protective defense -behavioral mechanism that one who is injured develops. If their minds are not spiritually renewed, the sin-nature inevitably entraps hurt individuals to believe that their way of thinking and behaving is safe and securing, when it is actually distressing, tormenting and causes others pain. In her attempt to portray that unseen emotional wounds are just as damaging and real as physical wounds, she illustrates to her readers a story comparing two young little victims, Beth and Meg. Beth, a five year old beautiful girl ran after her soccer ball into the street and was hit by a car. In utter shock watching the accident unfold, her

More about Critique of Dr. Sandra D. Wilson’s Theory of Change

Open Document