Critical Essay on Matthew Arnold's "East London"

1099 Words5 Pages
A Critical Reading of Matthew Arnold’s “East London”: A historical account of East London’s Boroughs through a hopeful eye. Matthew Arnold was clearly a Victorian writer. Victorian poetry tended to use detail to construct images that best represented the emotion of the poem(Christ 997). “East London” is in free verse, which contains a brief dialogue between the narrator, possibly Arnold himself, and a preacher. The short but descriptive poem gives the reader much insight into the setting, the plot, the time, as well as personal insight of both the preacher as well as the narrator. There is, as well, some historical truth to the dialogue given in “East London” which does confirm the narrator as Matthew Arnold himself. The setting of “East London” is described in the first few lines. “Twas August, and the fierce sun overhead/Smote on the squalid streets of Bethnal Green”(1-2); this report is not one of beauty. The hot summer sun is striking down on the filthy streets of the East End of London. These pictorial images give us a grim outlook on the setting of the poem we have just begun. This image precedes the feeling of the scene: “the pale weaver, through his windows seen/In Spitalfields, looked thrice dispirited”(3-4). The two separate parts of the setting, the portrait as well as attitude, both revoke a sense of discouragement, dejection, and lack of hope. Spitalfields became a by-word for urban deprivation. Arnold is using this as a reference point because his contemporary readers would know that this was a slum area of London in the wake of poverty and many diseases. The focal point of the poem is with the brief encounter with the preacher. The narrator knew this preacher and quickly comments on the look of the man being “’Ill and o’erworked,’” and asks “’how fare you in this scene?’” The response of the preacher is I believe a surprising one in these
Open Document