Conservative Analysis of Poverty Manifesto

1315 Words6 Pages
The Culture of Poverty: Rejecting the Poverty Manifesto Muhammad H Khalid Stony Brook University Culture of Poverty: Rejecting the Poverty Manifesto If one attempts to challenge the “culture of poverty”, it would be essential to first challenge the “hidden culture” of American society in general. Chapter 7 titled “The Poverty Manifesto” of the book The Rich and the Rest of Us takes a relatively left wing approach to tackle the issue of generational poverty. That is where the rich tend to get richer, while the poor and “middle class” tend to remain the same, if not get poorer as time progresses. The chapter suggests that the rise of the F.I.R.E industry namely finance capitalism, insurance, and real estate, and that their capitalistic and political influence determine the shape of our nation. In terms of approaching poverty, it isn’t wrong, per say. It is not, however, the complete picture. While it is true corporate influence exists in nearly every realm of our global society, what is also true is that it is the classified poor and middle class who ensure this power to them. The two most commonly taken paths by the so called “99%” of this country are to one live the prescribed life of an employee. Work the 9-5, get a tri-annual promotion, pay the 30% tax, and when reaching the $80,000 salary mark, being satisfied with it. The alternate route is to refuse to “work for the man”. Live a life of chosen poverty, in an attempt to not associate with the corrupt system. The problem with the former is acceptance without challenge. The problem with the latter is challenge without a recognizable platform to do so. The influence of companies and the involvement of government aren’t present as a necessity of circumstance. They are there because we so eagerly welcome them. Until we as a society wake up, and challenge social institutions from a place of education,

More about Conservative Analysis of Poverty Manifesto

Open Document