Conflict Is Not Always Bad

740 Words3 Pages
Conflict is not always bad To the majority of people the word conflict has a negative connotation as it is often linked to war and argument. Conflict can be as serious as the bloodiest wars which cause great suffering to many, however it can also be as trivial as the conflict you may experience while squabbling over what colour the wall should be with your wife. Conflict is merely a difference in opinion, the extent to which the parties involved care about the issue is what causes the seriousness of a conflict. Whilst conflict can be bad, it is a catalyst for change and is also an essential factor to shaping our identity, our experiences of conflict defines who we are and are how we create our own values and opinions on everyday life. So is conflict always bad? There have been many examples of conflicts which have been bad, and have lead to much suffering and pain for those involved. These conflicts are the ones that are most heard of and give the conflict its negative connotation. Examples like the Tiananmen Square Massacre where thousands of unarmed students were killed while protesting against the government for disgracing Hu Yaobang, who was a general party secretary of the Chinese communist party that advocated a transparent government and removal of some control from the government. The protests continued for months before military intervention forced an end killing many in the process. It is events like this stick with society and are remembered as an event of immense cruelty, suffering where many died in vain. Neither side of the conflict gained anything directly and in fact ‘lost’ a considerable amount. Countless lives were lost and the government’s reputation has been greatly diminished as the US put economic sanctions on china, and large scale protests took place in Hong Kong, Shanghai and other cities. However
Open Document