Pygmalion And The Importance Of Being Earnest Analysis

641 Words3 Pages
The presentation of society and social class are significant in Oscar Wilde's 'The Importance of Being Earnest', written in 1895, and George Bernard Shaw's 'Pygmalion', written in 1912. Each author uses a variety of techniques to explore the extent in which characters and events portray society and the social class in the era of which they are written. Morality in society is a significant aspect in which both Wilde and Shaw present through characterisations.Wilde uses Algernon’s character to make witty comments such as “more than half a modern culture depends on what one shouldn’t read”. This suggests the restrictions and assumptions which create a strict moral code existing in Victorian society; furthermore, this use of epigram allows Wilde to emphasize the mockery towards social morality. This view is supported by David Parker, who establishes the play as “Restoration Comedy”, implying Wilde does not deal with the problems of society in an orthodox manner as most plays do but…show more content…
Algernon's view on his servant Lane in 'The Importance of Being Ernest' reflects this: "If the lower orders don't set us a good example, what on earth is the use of them?"Algernon believes the lower classes should set a moral example for the upper class subverting the conventional view of the upper class acting as the role models. Wilde use of irony is significant as it emphasises how corrupt the upper class because, although they are at the top of the social hierachy, they rely on those ranked below them for moral examples. Additionally, the idea that there would be no "use" for his servant if he fails to do so shows how reliant Algernon is on Lane, and, as Lane represents the lower class, how much the lower class are needed by the upper class. Wilde uses irony and humour to invert class roles in order to call attention to the corruption of Victorian society to the audience at the
Open Document