Comparative Criticism of Two Architecture Schools

1750 Words7 Pages
Comparative criticism of two Architecture schools: Art and Architecture school, Yale University, Connecticut, USA. Architecture school, University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, New Mexico. Educational buildings are the host of new ideas and new generations and consequently; control the development of the society where it belongs. There for; educational buildings should be inspirational spaces that always encourage their users and students to create, innovate, and share new ideas. Specially Art and Architecture schools; where there students always crave for inspiration and creativity. Two architecture schools, that are said to be ‘separated at birth’ one completed in 1963 and the other in 2008, in different locations and having different conditions and restrictions but surprisingly having a lot in common. The older is the Art and Architecture school (A&A) in Yale university, designed by: Paul Rudolph, the other is the School of Architecture in the University of New Mexico, designed by: Antoine Predock. Each of the two schools act as entrances for their respective campuses, both plans are centered around a double height volume, and their front (street) elevations are study spaces in a rectangular mass. But despite all these similarities, each architect had his own intensions, and expressed his time in his special way with suitable treatments and solutions that will be discussed within the comparative analysis of the following aspects: Planning: At a gateway corner pivoting New Haven into the Yale university campus, Rudolph sited his building to act as an entrance for the campus. It is a monumental play of interlocking spaces and cubes pinwheeling off four massive service piers. The design recalled the concrete masts of Frank Lloyd Wright's Larkin Building in Buffalo, N.Y. Rudolph brought a dazzling complexity to Wright's four-poster idea,

More about Comparative Criticism of Two Architecture Schools

Open Document