Clueless as an Adaptation of Emma

1339 Words6 Pages
Jane Austin’s Emma depicts a society governed by breeding and wealth. In contrast, Amy Heckerling’s film Clueless, explores the values of consumerist, postmodern America. By adapting the genteel, class-based society of Highbury to the wealthy, superficial microcosm of 20th century Beverly Hills, an insight is given into residual and evolving values and attitudes towards class, marriage and gender roles over the past two centuries. Different visual and literary techniques highlight that while some aspects of society have changed, others remain the same. The rigidity of class and clique is an aspect that is explored in both Emma and Clueless. When aware of Emma’s plans to match him with Harriet, Mr Elton expresses his disbelief with hyperbole: “I never thought of Miss Smith in the whole course of my existence… never cared if she were dead or alive…” Mr Elton is ardently against the notion of any romantic attachment to a social inferior, giving a satirical insight into how shallow and inflexible the class doctrine of the time was. Elton’s rhetorical questions towards Cher in Clueless show a similar class consciousness and sense of outrage at the possibility of being romantically interested in Tai: “Why Tai!? Why Tai!? Do you know who my father is?” A long shot of a blinking, neon clown sign dwarfs Cher after she is abandoned by Elton; a symbol of society’s mockery and disapproval of her attempts to undermine an inherent system of class and clique. Emma’s high modality and contemptuous attitude when she claims that “the yeomanry are precisely the order of people… with whom I feel I can have nothing to do” confirms the inflexibility of class interactions. However, a change is evident in Clueless, where we see the power of notoriety and celebrity fracturing the boundaries of social cliques and class when the socially unacceptable Tai is popularised through her
Open Document