Civil War Political Analysis

1432 Words6 Pages
America was facing numerous issues in the 1860s which seemed to all be generated from one source, slavery. The expansion of slave trade and possession was rapidly growing throughout a great deal of the Southern states that made up the Confederacy. Ultimately, the issue of slavery precipitated more and more problems between the Union and the Confederacy such as raging disputes amongst political parties, secession, and entire nation divided. All common altercations are derived from opposing viewpoints, and with the conflict surrounding slavery, a civil war broke out. The defintion of a civil war is a series of battles between political factions or regions within the same country. To imagine a portion of a broken country fighting its other half…show more content…
The friction between those of the general public is essentially comprised of the bitter resentment political figures have of each other. Political leaders are around to gather advocates and trust in order to benefit themselves when elections arrive. Their method of finding and trusting ceratin followers is orthodox and near identical, politicians just need to set the people against one another. With opposing forces within the general public, the discord between two politicians grows at an alarming rate. A quote from Georgia's Herald later included in the New York Tribune states that "All northern, and especially the New England, states are devoid of society fitted for well-bred southern gentlemen. The prevailing class one meets with is that of mechanics struggling to be genteel, and small farmers who do their own drudgery, and yet hardly fit for association with a southern gentlemen's body servant" (F). Basically, this quote explains how the nation was divided. There was the industrial North against the agricultural South. Both had different positions on various matters. One of those matters was slavery. A large quantity of men in the South owned black slaves to work for or with them on laborious tasks. Many Northerners disagreed with the idea and actions of slavery which soon enough led to a civil war. The "Declaration of the National Anti-Slavery Convention" says "[That] we…show more content…
Yes, American history would repeat itself making an interesting cause of stress between North and South. It was America's nature to fight for a specific cause and that is just what the country was willing to do. However, they could not because the dispute was between two regions of country or could they? This is how the American Civil War began. One section of the nation was passionate towards one side of an argument and when the other section adapted the opposing viewpoint, a civil war occured. Secession was also a common action which was when eleven Southern states "left" the original country then producing their own. Senator Henry Clay said "I say it is impossible that South Carolina ever desired for a moment to become a separate and independent state" (A). Clay mentions that South Carolina's action of seceding from the Union is actually quite unimaginable. They never really wanted to become an independent state but to form an entirely new nation called the Confederacy. I'm sure Clay would have seen this as another country for the state to "hide behind". Senator Daniel Webster stated "I hear with pain and anguish the word 'secession,' especially when it falls from the lips of those who are emminnently [sic] patriotic, and known to the country, and known all over the world for their political services. Secession! Peaceable secession! Sir, your eyes and mine are never destined to
Open Document